Mailing Lists
xml-dev
RE: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subsetof a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook - 8/1/2003 12:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] more politics - 8/1/2003 12:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? - 8/1/2003 12:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes - 8/1/2003 12:24:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subsetof a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? - 8/1/2003 12:39:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:41:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [MAILER-DAEMON@reutershealth.com: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: lists.org.xml: host not found)] - 8/1/2003 12:50:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/1/2003 12:53:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] more politics - 8/1/2003 1:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? - 8/1/2003 1:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes - 8/1/2003 1:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 1:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [MAILER-DAEMON@reutershealth.com: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: lists.org.xml: host not found)] - 8/1/2003 4:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes - 8/1/2003 5:16:00 AM
multiple schemas, annotations - 8/1/2003 6:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] more politics - 8/1/2003 6:45:00 AM
XSL transformation clientside errors - 8/1/2003 7:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes - 8/1/2003 7:42:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 11:22:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How did "public identifier" get its name... - 8/1/2003 1:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] more politics - 8/1/2003 1:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subsetof a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 1:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? - 8/1/2003 3:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/2/2003 11:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/2/2003 11:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/3/2003 12:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/3/2003 10:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/3/2003 11:45:00 PM
A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 12:13:00 PM
Number of name characters? - 8/4/2003 6:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/4/2003 6:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/4/2003 6:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 6:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/4/2003 6:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/4/2003 7:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node -how? - 8/4/2003 7:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/4/2003 7:38:00 PM
Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 8:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Number of name characters? - 8/4/2003 8:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 9:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Number of name characters? - 8/5/2003 12:21:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/5/2003 4:32:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 12:30:00 PM
Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 12:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 1:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 1:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 2:21:00 PM
Encoding URI's for xml validation - 8/5/2003 6:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/6/2003 2:54:00 PM
XML-XML Mapping - 8/6/2003 3:28:00 PM
ANN: InferEd (RDF Editor w/ Inference) Beta2 Released - 8/7/2003 2:40:00 PM
What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 6:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 6:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 7:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 7:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 8:43:00 PM
[ANN] Exchanger XML Editor 1.0 Released - 8/7/2003 11:02:00 PM
Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 11:44:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 8:03:00 PM
Determining version of MSXML in use - 8/8/2003 8:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 8:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 10:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 10:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 11:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Determining version of MSXML in use - 8/8/2003 11:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] tool to generate one standalone DTD from multiplemodule DTD - 8/9/2003 1:44:00 PM
Random thoughts on reflection - 8/9/2003 6:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Oasis website down? - 8/10/2003 7:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Oasis website down? - 8/10/2003 8:08:00 AM
ANN: Enhancing Data Interoperability with Ontologies, Canonical Forms, and Include Files - 8/10/2003 2:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/10/2003 5:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/10/2003 6:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/10/2003 7:55:00 PM
graphs and trees - 8/10/2003 9:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/11/2003 1:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/11/2003 1:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/11/2003 8:48:00 AM
ANN: Syntext Serna Beta Release: XSL-on-the-fly WYSIWYG XML Editor - 8/11/2003 2:05:00 PM
Web Services and URIs - 8/11/2003 2:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/11/2003 5:38:00 PM
Automated ASCII to XML converter - 8/11/2003 8:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Automated ASCII to XML converter - 8/11/2003 11:14:00 PM
Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE - 8/11/2003 11:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE - 8/12/2003 4:17:00 PM
Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 8:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 9:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 9:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 9:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 10:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 12:20:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 1:17:00 AM
Adding standalone - 8/13/2003 1:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 1:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/13/2003 2:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 2:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/13/2003 2:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 2:51:00 PM
embedding RDF in XHTML - 8/13/2003 3:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 3:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Silly indemnity FUD) - 8/13/2003 5:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 6:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 6:18:00 PM
Escaping XML? Flattening the parse tree? - 8/13/2003 7:23:00 PM
Data vs. Document-Oriented XML - Better Terms? (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL) - 8/13/2003 7:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 8:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD - 8/13/2003 8:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD - 8/13/2003 8:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Data vs. Document-Oriented XML - Better Terms? (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL) - 8/13/2003 8:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 8:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 8:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 9:11:00 PM
Adding standalone="yes" to XML document - 8/14/2003 3:44:00 AM
XACML adding new functions - 8/14/2003 6:49:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 1:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD - 8/14/2003 1:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/14/2003 2:48:00 PM
SMIL markup - 8/14/2003 3:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 3:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/14/2003 3:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document - 8/14/2003 4:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document - 8/14/2003 4:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 4:23:00 PM
[ANN] XML Editor 2.0.3 - 8/14/2003 4:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 5:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Paypal - 8/14/2003 6:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/14/2003 6:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/14/2003 6:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Paypal - 8/14/2003 7:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Paypal)) - 8/14/2003 7:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 7:51:00 PM
Help with Schema - 8/14/2003 10:28:00 PM
Python/XML parsing - 8/14/2003 11:53:00 PM
Wiki SVG whiteboard - 8/15/2003 11:51:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Paypal)) - 8/15/2003 1:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/15/2003 1:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/15/2003 1:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/15/2003 2:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/15/2003 4:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] thinking about "namespace pedantry" - 8/15/2003 5:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Java SAX tools (was: Re: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document) - 8/15/2003 5:33:00 PM
The State of the XUL Union - 8/15/2003 7:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] thinking about "namespace pedantry" - 8/15/2003 8:55:00 PM
Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml - 8/16/2003 3:18:00 AM
Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml - 8/16/2003 3:18:00 AM
Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml - 8/16/2003 3:19:00 AM
Announcement: XML Acronym Demystifier - 8/17/2003 1:03:00 PM
Parsing XML - 8/18/2003 4:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/18/2003 10:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/18/2003 11:27:00 AM
Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects Patent - 8/18/2003 1:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 1:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 2:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... - 8/18/2003 2:06:00 PM
A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/18/2003 4:15:00 PM
[Fwd: [cam] Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing togetherreusable XML fragments in prose?] - 8/18/2003 6:21:00 PM
The XML Acronym Demystifier - 8/18/2003 6:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XACML adding new functions - 8/18/2003 9:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/18/2003 10:13:00 PM
The need for a formal description - 8/18/2003 11:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/19/2003 11:24:00 AM
RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 11:38:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects Patent - 8/19/2003 1:20:00 PM
What's the delay with XSLT/XPath 2.0? - 8/19/2003 1:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/19/2003 3:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 6:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 7:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 8:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/19/2003 9:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 9:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/19/2003 9:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 9:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 10:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/19/2003 10:19:00 PM
CFP: XML Database Symposium (XSym03) @ VLDB 2003 - 8/20/2003 8:29:00 AM
XSLT 2.0 Processor = XSLT Processor + W3 XML Schema Validator - 8/20/2003 10:45:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/20/2003 1:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 1:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 2:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 2:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/20/2003 3:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/20/2003 4:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 4:28:00 PM
opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 4:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 4:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/20/2003 5:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 5:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 5:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 8:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 10:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 12:05:00 AM
Why does MSXML ignore encoding clause? - 8/21/2003 6:52:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Why does MSXML ignore encoding clause? - 8/21/2003 7:10:00 AM
[ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-08-21 - 8/21/2003 8:22:00 AM
ANN: Syntext Dtd2Xs v1.3 - Complex&Modularized XML DTD to XML SchemaConverter - 8/21/2003 10:14:00 AM
Schema validators - 8/21/2003 12:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schema validators - 8/21/2003 12:35:00 PM
InkML - 8/21/2003 1:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 1:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 2:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 2:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 3:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 3:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 3:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 4:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 4:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 4:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 5:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 5:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 6:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 7:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 7:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 7:28:00 PM
Open Letter to Web Services, Semantics, Semantic Web and Ontology Communities - 8/21/2003 10:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (was: Are we ready...) - 8/21/2003 10:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Overlapping namespaces (was: Are we ready ...) - 8/21/2003 11:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (was: Are we r eady...) - 8/21/2003 11:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? - 8/22/2003 12:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Overlapping namespaces (was: Are we ready ...) - 8/22/2003 6:51:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/22/2003 1:08:00 PM
Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose?) - 8/22/2003 1:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Overlapping namespaces (was: Are we ready ...) - 8/22/2003 4:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: [xml-dev] A sta ndard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose?) - 8/22/2003 5:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: [ xml-dev] A sta ndard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragment s in prose?) - 8/22/2003 6:49:00 PM
[ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-08-25 - 8/25/2003 4:59:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 2:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 2:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:40:00 PM
Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:43:00 PM
XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 4:08:00 PM
RE: XQuery updates and unnormalized data (RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?) - 8/25/2003 4:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 5:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 5:12:00 PM
[xml-dev] XML web programming using VB - 8/25/2003 5:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 1:41:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML web programming using VB - 8/26/2003 6:59:00 AM
XSLT and Schemas - 8/26/2003 11:25:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 2:19:00 PM
PHIL: Why The Web is Mediocre (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?) - 8/26/2003 3:07:00 PM
XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 4:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 5:32:00 PM
[ANNOUNCE] WYSIWYG XSL website editor .. - 8/26/2003 5:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 5:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 6:22:00 PM
XML.Net find node by content and change attribute - 8/26/2003 7:41:00 PM
Georgia State University Electronic Court Filing Project -- Lesson Learned III - 8/26/2003 7:52:00 PM
Namespace declaration and schema validation problems - 8/27/2003 9:18:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 1:28:00 PM
RE: xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 1:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 2:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 2:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 3:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration and schema validation problems - 8/27/2003 4:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Need help on JAXB! - 8/27/2003 4:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML.Net find node by content and change attribute - 8/27/2003 4:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 4:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 5:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 5:55:00 PM
RE: G. Orwell (was: xml taxonomy) - 8/27/2003 6:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model [long] - 8/27/2003 6:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 6:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 6:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 7:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/28/2003 12:09:00 AM
XML mapping to java objects - 8/28/2003 8:47:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/28/2003 1:22:00 PM
Re: Question about UTF-8 - 8/28/2003 1:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXM L fragments in prose? - 8/28/2003 1:51:00 PM
Linking xml files together - 8/28/2003 2:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/28/2003 5:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model [long] - 8/28/2003 5:24:00 PM
freeware command line toolkit for XML - 8/28/2003 10:41:00 PM
Announce: Public XSL training in Europe - September 22-26, 2003 - XML-Dev - 8/29/2003 2:39:00 AM
XML storage - 8/29/2003 8:08:00 AM
[OT] Who said the browser wasn't dead? - 8/29/2003 11:58:00 AM
XSLT and default namespaces - 8/29/2003 1:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Who said the browser wasn't dead? - 8/29/2003 2:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Question about UTF-8 - 8/29/2003 3:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Mixed Content - 8/29/2003 5:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Linking xml files together - 8/29/2003 5:43:00 PM
Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 6:40:00 PM
[ANN] xmloperator 2.3 - 8/30/2003 3:16:00 PM
Native XML databases - 8/31/2003 3:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook - 8/1/2003 12:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] more politics - 8/1/2003 12:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? - 8/1/2003 12:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes - 8/1/2003 12:24:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subsetof a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? - 8/1/2003 12:39:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:41:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [MAILER-DAEMON@reutershealth.com: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: lists.org.xml: host not found)] - 8/1/2003 12:50:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/1/2003 12:53:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] more politics - 8/1/2003 1:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? - 8/1/2003 1:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes - 8/1/2003 1:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 1:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 2:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/1/2003 2:01:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 6:04:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 8:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 1:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/2/2003 10:45:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 1:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/2/2003 10:45:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [MAILER-DAEMON@reutershealth.com: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: lists.org.xml: host not found)] - 8/1/2003 4:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes - 8/1/2003 5:16:00 AM
multiple schemas, annotations - 8/1/2003 6:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] more politics - 8/1/2003 6:45:00 AM
XSL transformation clientside errors - 8/1/2003 7:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes - 8/1/2003 7:42:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 11:22:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How did "public identifier" get its name... - 8/1/2003 1:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] more politics - 8/1/2003 1:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subsetof a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 1:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? - 8/1/2003 3:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/2/2003 11:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/2/2003 11:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/3/2003 12:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/3/2003 10:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/3/2003 11:45:00 PM
A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 12:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 2:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 2:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node -how? - 8/4/2003 2:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/4/2003 3:36:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 2:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node -how? - 8/4/2003 2:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 6:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 6:16:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 7:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 8:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 9:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/5/2003 12:18:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 8:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 9:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/5/2003 12:18:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/4/2003 6:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/4/2003 6:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 3:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawnof the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 4:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/4/2003 3:53:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/4/2003 6:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 3:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawnof the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 4:22:00 PM
Number of name characters? - 8/4/2003 6:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/4/2003 6:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/4/2003 6:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 6:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/4/2003 6:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/4/2003 7:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node -how? - 8/4/2003 7:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/4/2003 7:38:00 PM
Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 8:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Number of name characters? - 8/4/2003 8:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 4:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 12:39:00 PM
XMLURL problem! - 8/4/2003 9:26:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 4:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 12:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 9:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 11:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 12:38:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:56:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 12:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 4:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 5:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Number of name characters? - 8/4/2003 11:50:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 5:01:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Number of name characters? - 8/5/2003 12:21:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/5/2003 4:32:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 12:30:00 PM
Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 12:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 1:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 1:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 4:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 1:17:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 4:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 1:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev]Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 1:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 2:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 7:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev]Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 7:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/8/2003 9:09:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 1:48:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 2:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 7:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev]Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 7:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/8/2003 9:09:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 2:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 2:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 9:44:00 PM
Re: new line handling (DOMBuilder and DOMSerializer) - 8/5/2003 3:15:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 9:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 11:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/6/2003 1:00:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev]Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/6/2003 8:40:00 AM
rss 0.91 with rdf extension - 8/7/2003 8:23:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 12:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev]Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 12:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev]BinaryXML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 2:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev]Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 3:55:00 PM
rss 0.91 with rdf extension - 8/7/2003 8:23:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 12:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev]Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 12:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev]BinaryXML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 2:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev]Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 3:55:00 PM
Encoding URI's for xml validation - 8/5/2003 6:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation - 8/5/2003 8:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation - 8/10/2003 2:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation - 8/10/2003 3:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation - 8/10/2003 3:35:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/6/2003 2:06:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation - 8/10/2003 2:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation - 8/10/2003 3:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation - 8/10/2003 3:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/6/2003 9:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/6/2003 11:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 12:40:00 AM
ANNOUNCE: VixX3D Beta Edtor - 8/6/2003 2:38:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/6/2003 11:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 12:40:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/6/2003 2:54:00 PM
XML-XML Mapping - 8/6/2003 3:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML-XML Mapping - 8/6/2003 4:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML-XML Mapping - 8/6/2003 6:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML-XML Mapping - 8/7/2003 8:24:00 AM
RTF to XML Conversion (Majix or otherwise) - 8/6/2003 11:15:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] XML-XML Mapping - 8/6/2003 6:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML-XML Mapping - 8/7/2003 8:24:00 AM
ANN: InferEd (RDF Editor w/ Inference) Beta2 Released - 8/7/2003 2:40:00 PM
What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 6:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 8:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 8:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 6:41:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 8:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 6:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 7:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 7:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 8:43:00 PM
[ANN] Exchanger XML Editor 1.0 Released - 8/7/2003 11:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] Exchanger XML Editor 1.0 Released - 8/8/2003 8:56:00 AM
Re: [ANN] Exchanger XML Editor 1.0 Released - 8/10/2003 7:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] rss 0.91 with rdf extension - 8/8/2003 7:32:00 AMRe: [ANN] Exchanger XML Editor 1.0 Released - 8/10/2003 7:00:00 PM
Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 11:44:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 8:03:00 PM
Determining version of MSXML in use - 8/8/2003 8:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 8:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 10:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 10:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 11:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Determining version of MSXML in use - 8/8/2003 11:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] tool to generate one standalone DTD from multiplemodule DTD - 8/9/2003 1:44:00 PM
Random thoughts on reflection - 8/9/2003 6:34:00 PM
re: [xml-dev] Random thoughts on reflection - 8/9/2003 7:57:00 PM
re: [xml-dev] Random thoughts on reflection - 8/9/2003 8:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Random thoughts on reflection - 8/11/2003 8:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? - 8/10/2003 1:28:00 AMre: [xml-dev] Random thoughts on reflection - 8/9/2003 8:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Random thoughts on reflection - 8/11/2003 8:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Oasis website down? - 8/10/2003 7:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Oasis website down? - 8/10/2003 8:08:00 AM
ANN: Enhancing Data Interoperability with Ontologies, Canonical Forms, and Include Files - 8/10/2003 2:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/10/2003 5:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/10/2003 6:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/10/2003 7:55:00 PM
graphs and trees - 8/10/2003 9:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/11/2003 1:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/11/2003 1:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/11/2003 8:48:00 AM
ANN: Syntext Serna Beta Release: XSL-on-the-fly WYSIWYG XML Editor - 8/11/2003 2:05:00 PM
Web Services and URIs - 8/11/2003 2:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/11/2003 5:38:00 PM
Automated ASCII to XML converter - 8/11/2003 8:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Automated ASCII to XML converter - 8/11/2003 9:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Automated ASCII to XML converter - 8/12/2003 2:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/11/2003 10:29:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Automated ASCII to XML converter - 8/12/2003 2:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Automated ASCII to XML converter - 8/11/2003 11:14:00 PM
Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE - 8/11/2003 11:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE - 8/12/2003 12:28:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE - 8/12/2003 1:00:00 AM
ANN: eXist native XML database 0.9.2 - 8/12/2003 1:38:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE - 8/12/2003 1:00:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE - 8/12/2003 4:17:00 PM
Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 8:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 8:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 9:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 10:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 1:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 1:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 2:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 2:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 2:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 9:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 9:01:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 9:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 10:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 1:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 1:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 2:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 2:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 2:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 9:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 9:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 9:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 9:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 10:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 11:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 12:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 10:36:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 12:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 12:20:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 1:17:00 AM
Adding standalone - 8/13/2003 1:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 1:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/13/2003 2:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 2:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/13/2003 2:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 2:51:00 PM
embedding RDF in XHTML - 8/13/2003 3:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 3:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 3:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 8:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 5:33:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 8:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Silly indemnity FUD) - 8/13/2003 5:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 6:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 6:18:00 PM
Escaping XML? Flattening the parse tree? - 8/13/2003 7:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Escaping XML? Flattening the parse tree? - 8/13/2003 8:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Escaping XML? Flattening the parse tree? - 8/13/2003 8:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/13/2003 7:54:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Escaping XML? Flattening the parse tree? - 8/13/2003 8:57:00 PM
Data vs. Document-Oriented XML - Better Terms? (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL) - 8/13/2003 7:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 8:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD - 8/13/2003 8:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD - 8/13/2003 8:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Data vs. Document-Oriented XML - Better Terms? (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL) - 8/13/2003 8:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 8:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 8:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 9:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 12:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 8:52:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 12:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 9:11:00 PM
Adding standalone="yes" to XML document - 8/14/2003 3:44:00 AM
XACML adding new functions - 8/14/2003 6:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XACML adding new functions - 8/14/2003 12:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XACML adding new functions - 8/14/2003 1:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XACML adding new functions - 8/14/2003 2:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD - 8/14/2003 9:07:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] XACML adding new functions - 8/14/2003 1:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XACML adding new functions - 8/14/2003 2:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 1:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 2:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 7:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/14/2003 1:43:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 7:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD - 8/14/2003 1:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/14/2003 2:48:00 PM
SMIL markup - 8/14/2003 3:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 3:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/14/2003 3:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document - 8/14/2003 4:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document - 8/14/2003 4:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 4:23:00 PM
[ANN] XML Editor 2.0.3 - 8/14/2003 4:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 5:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Paypal - 8/14/2003 6:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/14/2003 6:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/14/2003 6:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/14/2003 7:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/15/2003 10:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 1:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 2:00:00 PM
"Types" of XML (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL) - 8/18/2003 2:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Types" of XML (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML databaseenviroment using PostgreSQL) - 8/19/2003 7:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Paypal - 8/14/2003 6:58:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/15/2003 10:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 1:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 2:00:00 PM
"Types" of XML (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL) - 8/18/2003 2:19:00 PM
question on XQuery -> SQL translators - 8/18/2003 2:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] question on XQuery -> SQL translators - 8/18/2003 4:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Types" of XML (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML databaseenviroment using PostgreSQL) - 8/18/2003 10:39:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] question on XQuery -> SQL translators - 8/18/2003 4:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Types" of XML (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML databaseenviroment using PostgreSQL) - 8/19/2003 7:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Paypal - 8/14/2003 7:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Paypal)) - 8/14/2003 7:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 7:51:00 PM
Help with Schema - 8/14/2003 10:28:00 PM
Python/XML parsing - 8/14/2003 11:53:00 PM
Wiki SVG whiteboard - 8/15/2003 11:51:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Paypal)) - 8/15/2003 1:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/15/2003 1:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/15/2003 1:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/15/2003 2:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/15/2003 4:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] thinking about "namespace pedantry" - 8/15/2003 5:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Java SAX tools (was: Re: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document) - 8/15/2003 5:33:00 PM
The State of the XUL Union - 8/15/2003 7:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] thinking about "namespace pedantry" - 8/15/2003 8:55:00 PM
Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml - 8/16/2003 3:18:00 AM
Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml - 8/16/2003 3:18:00 AM
Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml - 8/16/2003 3:19:00 AM
Announcement: XML Acronym Demystifier - 8/17/2003 1:03:00 PM
Parsing XML - 8/18/2003 4:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/18/2003 10:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/18/2003 11:27:00 AM
Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects Patent - 8/18/2003 1:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 1:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 2:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... - 8/18/2003 2:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects P... - 8/18/2003 2:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... - 8/18/2003 10:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects P... - 8/18/2003 10:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... - 8/18/2003 11:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects P... - 8/19/2003 8:23:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 2:17:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... - 8/18/2003 10:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects P... - 8/18/2003 10:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... - 8/18/2003 11:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects P... - 8/19/2003 8:23:00 AM
A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/18/2003 4:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/18/2003 4:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XMLfragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 1:54:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 3:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 4:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 4:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 6:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 7:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 8:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 11:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 7:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 1:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 10:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 11:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 12:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 12:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 1:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 2:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 9:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 12:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 1:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 8:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/22/2003 1:08:00 AM
RelaxNG question - 8/18/2003 5:26:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XMLfragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 1:54:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 3:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 4:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 4:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 6:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 7:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 8:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 11:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 12:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 1:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 1:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 10:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 10:58:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 12:40:00 PM
XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 1:53:00 PM
Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 12:49:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standardapproach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 1:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approachto glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 1:26:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 2:50:00 AM
Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach toglueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 2:09:00 PM
Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/25/2003 3:50:00 PM
Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 2:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/27/2003 1:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 1:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 1:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 4:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approachto glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 3:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 12:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 2:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model -- CMM & ISO 9000 - FINAL POST TO BOTH THREADS BY ME. - 8/28/2003 8:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 2:30:00 PMRe: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 12:49:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standardapproach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 1:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approachto glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 1:26:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 2:50:00 AM
Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach toglueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 2:09:00 PM
Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/25/2003 3:50:00 PM
Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 2:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/27/2003 1:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 1:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 1:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 4:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approachto glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 3:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 12:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 2:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model -- CMM & ISO 9000 - FINAL POST TO BOTH THREADS BY ME. - 8/28/2003 8:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 3:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 2:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 12:57:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 2:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 1:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 1:12:00 PM
XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 3:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] Astandard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 3:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standardapproach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 1:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standardapproach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 1:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] Astandard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 2:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] Astandard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 9:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 4:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 5:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 1:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 7:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 10:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 4:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 6:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 11:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev]A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 1:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 2:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] Astandard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 7:42:00 PM
Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 2:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 11:36:00 PM
Need help on JAXB! - 8/27/2003 10:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 2:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 5:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 5:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 5:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 9:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 9:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 11:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model -- CMM & ISO 9000 - FINAL POST TO BOTH THREADS BY ME. - 8/28/2003 4:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model -- CMM & ISO 9000 - FINAL POST TO BOTH THREADS BY ME. - 8/28/2003 5:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 2:00:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] Astandard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 3:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standardapproach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 1:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standardapproach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 1:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] Astandard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 2:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] Astandard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 9:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 4:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 5:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 1:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 7:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 10:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 4:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 6:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 11:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev]A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 1:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 2:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] Astandard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 7:42:00 PM
Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 2:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 11:36:00 PM
Need help on JAXB! - 8/27/2003 10:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 2:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 5:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 5:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 5:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 9:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 9:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 11:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model -- CMM & ISO 9000 - FINAL POST TO BOTH THREADS BY ME. - 8/28/2003 4:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model -- CMM & ISO 9000 - FINAL POST TO BOTH THREADS BY ME. - 8/28/2003 5:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 10:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 11:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 7:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 1:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 10:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 11:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 12:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 12:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 1:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 2:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 9:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 12:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 1:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 8:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/22/2003 1:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/18/2003 10:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/19/2003 2:43:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] tool to generate one standalone DTD from multiple module DTD - 8/18/2003 5:38:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/19/2003 2:43:00 AM
[Fwd: [cam] Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing togetherreusable XML fragments in prose?] - 8/18/2003 6:21:00 PM
The XML Acronym Demystifier - 8/18/2003 6:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The XML Acronym Demystifier - 8/18/2003 6:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The XML Acronym Demystifier - 8/18/2003 7:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] question on XQuery -> SQL translators - 8/18/2003 7:16:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] The XML Acronym Demystifier - 8/18/2003 7:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XACML adding new functions - 8/18/2003 9:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/18/2003 10:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/18/2003 10:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/18/2003 10:17:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/18/2003 11:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/18/2003 11:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/19/2003 11:09:00 AM
RDF and RELAX NG - 8/22/2003 12:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RDF and RELAX NG - 8/22/2003 1:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RDF and RELAX NG - 8/22/2003 6:29:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] RDF and RELAX NG - 8/24/2003 10:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RDF and RELAX NG - 8/22/2003 1:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDF and RELAX NG - 8/25/2003 5:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/19/2003 11:09:00 AM
RDF and RELAX NG - 8/22/2003 12:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RDF and RELAX NG - 8/22/2003 1:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RDF and RELAX NG - 8/22/2003 6:29:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] RDF and RELAX NG - 8/24/2003 10:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RDF and RELAX NG - 8/22/2003 1:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDF and RELAX NG - 8/25/2003 5:57:00 PM
The need for a formal description - 8/18/2003 11:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/19/2003 11:24:00 AM
RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 11:38:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects Patent - 8/19/2003 1:20:00 PM
What's the delay with XSLT/XPath 2.0? - 8/19/2003 1:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/19/2003 3:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 6:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 7:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 7:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 8:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 7:54:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 8:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 8:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 8:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 10:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 8:47:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 10:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 9:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 9:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/19/2003 8:59:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 9:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/19/2003 9:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 9:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/19/2003 9:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 9:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 10:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/20/2003 5:06:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/20/2003 12:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 10:07:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/20/2003 12:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/19/2003 10:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/19/2003 10:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 3:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/19/2003 10:32:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 3:26:00 PM
CFP: XML Database Symposium (XSym03) @ VLDB 2003 - 8/20/2003 8:29:00 AM
XSLT 2.0 Processor = XSLT Processor + W3 XML Schema Validator - 8/20/2003 10:45:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/20/2003 1:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 1:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 2:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 2:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/20/2003 3:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/20/2003 4:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 4:28:00 PM
opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 4:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 4:54:00 PM
Re: opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 5:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 5:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 6:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 8:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 4:52:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 5:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 5:05:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 7:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 8:22:00 PM
RSS for RSS? - 8/20/2003 7:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 8:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 10:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 10:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/21/2003 12:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 8:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 10:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 11:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 8:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 11:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 8:22:00 PM
RSS for RSS? - 8/20/2003 7:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 8:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 10:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 10:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/21/2003 12:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 8:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 10:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 11:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 8:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 11:14:00 PM
Re: opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 5:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 5:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 6:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 8:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 5:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/24/2003 5:07:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/20/2003 4:53:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/24/2003 5:07:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 4:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/20/2003 5:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 5:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 5:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 5:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/21/2003 3:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 5:27:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/21/2003 3:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 8:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 10:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 12:05:00 AM
Why does MSXML ignore encoding clause? - 8/21/2003 6:52:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Why does MSXML ignore encoding clause? - 8/21/2003 7:10:00 AM
[ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-08-21 - 8/21/2003 8:22:00 AM
ANN: Syntext Dtd2Xs v1.3 - Complex&Modularized XML DTD to XML SchemaConverter - 8/21/2003 10:14:00 AM
Schema validators - 8/21/2003 12:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schema validators - 8/21/2003 12:35:00 PM
InkML - 8/21/2003 1:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 1:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 1:34:00 PM
Re: InkML - 8/22/2003 1:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 1:16:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 1:34:00 PM
Re: InkML - 8/22/2003 1:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 1:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 2:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 2:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 3:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 3:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 3:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 4:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 4:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 4:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 4:34:00 PMThe Granularity of Markup (Re: [xml-dev] InkML) - 8/22/2003 6:22:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The Granularity of Markup (Re: [xml-dev] InkML) - 8/26/2003 7:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 4:38:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] The Granularity of Markup (Re: [xml-dev] InkML) - 8/22/2003 11:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The Granularity of Markup (Re: [xml-dev] InkML) - 8/22/2003 12:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The Granularity of Markup (Re: [xml-dev] InkML) - 8/23/2003 6:31:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] The Granularity of Markup (Re: [xml-dev] InkML) - 8/22/2003 12:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The Granularity of Markup (Re: [xml-dev] InkML) - 8/26/2003 7:42:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 4:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 5:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 5:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 6:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 7:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 7:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 7:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 7:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 10:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 7:52:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 10:30:00 PM
Open Letter to Web Services, Semantics, Semantic Web and Ontology Communities - 8/21/2003 10:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (was: Are we ready...) - 8/21/2003 10:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Overlapping namespaces (was: Are we ready ...) - 8/21/2003 11:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (was: Are we r eady...) - 8/21/2003 11:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? - 8/22/2003 12:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Overlapping namespaces (was: Are we ready ...) - 8/22/2003 6:51:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/22/2003 1:08:00 PM
Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose?) - 8/22/2003 1:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Overlapping namespaces (was: Are we ready ...) - 8/22/2003 4:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: [xml-dev] A sta ndard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose?) - 8/22/2003 5:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: [ xml-dev] A sta ndard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragment s in prose?) - 8/22/2003 6:49:00 PM
[ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-08-25 - 8/25/2003 4:59:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 2:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 2:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 6:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:01:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 6:50:00 PM
XQuery updates and unnormalized data (RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?) - 8/25/2003 4:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 6:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:05:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 6:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 7:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 10:56:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 7:53:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 8:38:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 12:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 2:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 3:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragmentsin prose? - 8/26/2003 3:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 9:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 5:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 9:48:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 1:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 7:52:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 8:38:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 12:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 2:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 3:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragmentsin prose? - 8/26/2003 3:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 9:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 5:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 9:48:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 1:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:40:00 PM
Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:43:00 PM
XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approachto glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 7:21:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approachto glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 6:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 4:05:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approachto glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 6:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 4:08:00 PM
RE: XQuery updates and unnormalized data (RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?) - 8/25/2003 4:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 5:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 5:12:00 PM
[xml-dev] XML web programming using VB - 8/25/2003 5:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 1:41:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML web programming using VB - 8/26/2003 6:59:00 AM
XSLT and Schemas - 8/26/2003 11:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT and Schemas - 8/26/2003 11:37:00 AM
Billions and billions? - 8/26/2003 12:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Billions and billions? - 8/26/2003 12:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Billions and billions? - 8/26/2003 12:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 2:19:00 PMBillions and billions? - 8/26/2003 12:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Billions and billions? - 8/26/2003 12:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Billions and billions? - 8/26/2003 12:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 2:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 2:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:36:00 PM
Synopsis - An Open Letter to - 8/26/2003 3:00:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:36:00 PM
PHIL: Why The Web is Mediocre (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?) - 8/26/2003 3:07:00 PM
XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 4:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 4:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 4:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 4:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 10:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 5:09:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 4:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 4:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 10:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 5:32:00 PM
[ANNOUNCE] WYSIWYG XSL website editor .. - 8/26/2003 5:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 5:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 6:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 6:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 9:20:00 PM
Mondial: The CIA World Factbook in Oracle, XML, F-Logic, and Datalog - 8/26/2003 6:59:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 9:20:00 PM
XML.Net find node by content and change attribute - 8/26/2003 7:41:00 PM
Georgia State University Electronic Court Filing Project -- Lesson Learned III - 8/26/2003 7:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Georgia State University Electronic Court Filing Project -- Lesson Learned III - 8/26/2003 7:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Georgia State University Electronic Court Filing Project -- Lesson Learned III - 8/26/2003 8:16:00 PM
Final CFP: XML Database Symposium (XSym03) @ VLDB 2003 - 8/27/2003 8:52:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Georgia State University Electronic Court Filing Project -- Lesson Learned III - 8/26/2003 8:16:00 PM
Namespace declaration and schema validation problems - 8/27/2003 9:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration and schema validation problems - 8/27/2003 10:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration and schema validation problems - 8/27/2003 1:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration and schema validation problems - 8/27/2003 4:58:00 PM
xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 1:05:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration and schema validation problems - 8/27/2003 1:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration and schema validation problems - 8/27/2003 4:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 1:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/28/2003 9:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/28/2003 11:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/28/2003 1:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 1:08:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/28/2003 9:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/28/2003 11:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/28/2003 1:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 1:28:00 PM
RE: xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 1:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 2:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 2:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 10:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 11:58:00 PM
The relational model is to data as automata theory is to programs? - 8/27/2003 3:27:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 11:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 3:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration and schema validation problems - 8/27/2003 4:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Need help on JAXB! - 8/27/2003 4:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML.Net find node by content and change attribute - 8/27/2003 4:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 4:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 5:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 5:55:00 PM
RE: G. Orwell (was: xml taxonomy) - 8/27/2003 6:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model [long] - 8/27/2003 6:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 6:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 6:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 7:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/28/2003 12:09:00 AM
XML mapping to java objects - 8/28/2003 8:47:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/28/2003 1:22:00 PM
Re: Question about UTF-8 - 8/28/2003 1:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXM L fragments in prose? - 8/28/2003 1:51:00 PM
Linking xml files together - 8/28/2003 2:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/28/2003 5:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model [long] - 8/28/2003 5:24:00 PM
freeware command line toolkit for XML - 8/28/2003 10:41:00 PM
Announce: Public XSL training in Europe - September 22-26, 2003 - XML-Dev - 8/29/2003 2:39:00 AM
XML storage - 8/29/2003 8:08:00 AM
[OT] Who said the browser wasn't dead? - 8/29/2003 11:58:00 AM
XSLT and default namespaces - 8/29/2003 1:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Who said the browser wasn't dead? - 8/29/2003 2:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Question about UTF-8 - 8/29/2003 3:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Mixed Content - 8/29/2003 5:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Linking xml files together - 8/29/2003 5:43:00 PM
Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 6:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 7:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 8:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 8:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 9:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 9:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/30/2003 2:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/30/2003 3:20:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 9:26:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 8:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 8:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 9:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 9:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/30/2003 2:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/30/2003 3:20:00 AM
[ANN] xmloperator 2.3 - 8/30/2003 3:16:00 PM
Native XML databases - 8/31/2003 3:16:00 PM