Mailing Lists
xml-dev
Re: [xml-dev] Schema fragments for everyday stuff - 2/1/2004 12:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Universal names vs context - was Re: [xml-dev] Schema fragments for everyday stuff - 2/1/2004 1:11:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Schema fragments for everyday stuff - 2/1/2004 1:18:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/1/2004 10:43:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/1/2004 3:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Universal names vs context - was Re: [xml-dev] Schema fragments for everyday stuff - 2/1/2004 6:29:00 PM
Canonicalization software - 2/1/2004 7:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schema fragments for everyday stuff - 2/2/2004 9:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] BML == XAML [was Re: UK bank says browserless onlinebanking coming] - 2/2/2004 12:57:00 PM
XOM 1.0d23 Last Call - 2/2/2004 4:00:00 PM
O'Reilly Open Source Convention Call for Participation - 2/2/2004 4:06:00 PM
WARNING: Namespace thread virus (new variant?) - 2/2/2004 6:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 6:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 8:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WARNING: Namespace thread virus (new variant?) - 2/2/2004 8:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WARNING: Namespace thread virus (new variant?) - 2/2/2004 8:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 8:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 9:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 9:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schema fragments for everyday stuff - 2/2/2004 9:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 10:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 10:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 10:08:00 PM
RE: WARNING: Namespace thread virus (new variant?) - 2/2/2004 10:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 10:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: WARNING: Namespace thread virus (new variant?) - 2/3/2004 1:00:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 7:19:00 AM
XML parsing the only way? - 2/3/2004 10:28:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 4:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 4:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 5:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 6:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 6:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 6:32:00 PM
generating newsfeeds - 2/3/2004 6:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 8:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 9:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 10:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 10:29:00 PM
How to connect web services - 2/3/2004 10:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 11:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Updates (was Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ?) - 2/3/2004 11:16:00 PM
Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 3:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Problems with schema creation, help!! - 2/4/2004 4:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Problems with schema creation, help!! - 2/4/2004 5:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Problems with schema creation, help!! - 2/4/2004 5:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 5:47:00 PM
reply-to - 2/4/2004 7:35:00 PM
Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 7:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 8:28:00 PM
Choose your RSS - 2/4/2004 9:03:00 PM
more silly questions - 2/4/2004 9:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] reply-to - 2/4/2004 9:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 9:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Choose your RSS - 2/4/2004 9:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 9:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 9:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 10:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 10:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Choose your RSS - 2/4/2004 10:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Choose your RSS - 2/5/2004 12:15:00 AM
[ANN] XMLOpen Conference Reschedules - 2/5/2004 12:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 2:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 3:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 3:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 4:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] reply-to - 2/5/2004 4:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 4:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 5:53:00 PM
Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/5/2004 7:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 7:27:00 PM
Attribute values: double quote vs. single quote - 2/5/2004 8:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/5/2004 8:56:00 PM
SOAP library written in C - 2/5/2004 9:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 9:52:00 PM
hello - 2/5/2004 10:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 7:37:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 9:04:00 AM
Splitting the Atom - 2/6/2004 9:57:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 2:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] didn't i read somewhere how xml was going to facilitate document interchange - 2/6/2004 2:17:00 PM
XML Schema - redefine - 2/6/2004 3:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 3:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 9:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 10:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/7/2004 2:23:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/7/2004 2:44:00 AM
Problem associating an XML document with an XML schema - 2/7/2004 4:34:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/7/2004 5:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/7/2004 6:09:00 PM
Hello - 2/8/2004 11:31:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/8/2004 5:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] more silly questions - 2/8/2004 6:12:00 PM
A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 12:48:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 3:57:00 PM
[xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 4:16:00 PM
Alternative to MSXML - 2/9/2004 9:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 9:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] more silly questions - 2/9/2004 11:14:00 PM
Existing libraries/mechanisms for alphabetically sorting and formatting XML files - 2/10/2004 1:40:00 AM
Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/11/2004 10:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/11/2004 10:44:00 AM
and - predefined values for XML elements - 2/11/2004 12:09:00 PM
Job Scheduler Schemas? - 2/11/2004 2:31:00 PM
hello - 2/11/2004 3:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/11/2004 6:04:00 PM
xsd to xml - 2/11/2004 9:11:00 PM
NullPointerException - 2/12/2004 2:29:00 PM
database primary keys in XML Schema - 2/12/2004 7:18:00 PM
US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/12/2004 11:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XMLSpy and - 2/13/2004 10:55:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] database primary keys in XML Schema - 2/13/2004 1:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] database primary keys in XML Schema - 2/13/2004 1:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] database primary keys in XML Schema - 2/13/2004 1:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Is the USPTO run by knaves or fools? - was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/13/2004 2:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XMLSpy and - 2/13/2004 2:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patent Spam (was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897) - 2/13/2004 2:51:00 PM
XslBricks: Rapid XSL Stylesheet Development Library - 2/13/2004 3:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XMLSpy and - 2/13/2004 3:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patent Spam (was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897) - 2/13/2004 3:33:00 PM
XInclude - 2/13/2004 5:01:00 PM
Sax filter encoding problem - 2/13/2004 5:14:00 PM
Visualization: A Picture Is Worth A Beer - 2/13/2004 8:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Visualization: A Picture Is Worth A Beer - 2/13/2004 8:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Visualization: A Picture Is Worth A Beer - 2/13/2004 8:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Visualization: A Picture Is Worth A Beer - 2/13/2004 9:10:00 PM
generating XSLT from instances - 2/13/2004 10:13:00 PM
Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS - 2/13/2004 11:07:00 PM
Re: RE: [xml-dev] XML inside another XML - 2/14/2004 5:03:00 AM
Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz about XML - 2/14/2004 9:24:00 AM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML inside another XML - 2/15/2004 4:10:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz about XML - 2/15/2004 8:35:00 PM
"Your XML guide" - 2/16/2004 12:34:00 AM
id proxy - 2/16/2004 10:47:00 AM
RE: id proxy - 2/16/2004 2:25:00 PM
I wonder how much involved M$ really were when the final XML technicalrecommendation was finally released... - 2/16/2004 4:38:00 PM
JAXB Schema problems with complexTypes - 2/16/2004 5:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: id proxy - 2/16/2004 8:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] document XML inside another document XML using XLINK - 2/16/2004 10:21:00 PM
Double declaring same element - 2/17/2004 1:27:00 PM
doesn't work - 2/17/2004 1:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XMLSpy and - 2/17/2004 1:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/17/2004 3:26:00 PM
ID bjobiyo... thanks - 2/17/2004 3:32:00 PM
Posted genx alpha tarball and docs - 2/17/2004 11:54:00 PM
[ANN] new XML reader and writer - 2/18/2004 7:05:00 AM
ID rlsyuynaun... thanks - 2/18/2004 8:25:00 AM
Announcement: Release of Scala v1.1.0-b1 - 2/18/2004 9:13:00 AM
how to best integrate XML in a programming language - 2/18/2004 9:59:00 AM
JSR 206 and SAX - 2/18/2004 10:27:00 PM
XML publishing frameworks and software methodologies - 2/19/2004 12:22:00 PM
XML Help - 2/19/2004 3:42:00 PM
JAXB alternatives - 2/19/2004 4:38:00 PM
Validate XMLagainst schema - 2/19/2004 4:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Help - 2/20/2004 12:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] how to best integrate XML in a programming language - 2/20/2004 7:13:00 AM
RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/20/2004 9:00:00 AM
When Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam - 2/20/2004 2:13:00 PM
Local Vs Global Vocabularies ( Was RE: [xml-dev] When Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam) - 2/20/2004 2:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Local Vs Global Vocabularies - 2/20/2004 3:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Local Vs Global Vocabularies - 2/20/2004 4:04:00 PM
schema validate key uniqueness attribute (name) of elements - 2/20/2004 4:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Local Vs Global Vocabularies - 2/20/2004 4:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] schema validate key uniqueness attribute (name) ofelements - 2/20/2004 5:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/20/2004 5:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] schema validate key uniqueness attribute (name)ofelements - 2/20/2004 5:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/20/2004 7:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/20/2004 9:25:00 PM
Markup For Note taking - 2/21/2004 10:13:00 PM
SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization - 2/22/2004 2:16:00 PM
SAX2 Topic Summary - 2/22/2004 2:18:00 PM
SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support - 2/22/2004 2:19:00 PM
Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/22/2004 3:29:00 PM
Announce: Free Online XForms Validation Service - 2/23/2004 3:10:00 AM
Announce: XForms Institute Hosts O'Reilly XForms Essentials - 2/23/2004 3:10:00 AM
xlink svg namespace bug? - 2/23/2004 11:35:00 AM
websites - 2/23/2004 12:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] websites - 2/23/2004 2:37:00 PM
help XML - 2/23/2004 4:33:00 PM
Standards for Search Systems - 2/23/2004 5:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Standards for Search Systems - 2/23/2004 6:04:00 PM
equivalence of and et. al. ? - 2/23/2004 8:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] equivalence of and et. al. ? - 2/23/2004 8:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] websites - 2/23/2004 10:59:00 PM
writing good xml - 2/24/2004 12:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/24/2004 2:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/24/2004 2:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] help XML - 2/24/2004 5:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/24/2004 5:42:00 PM
Is XML UI Language (XUL) Going Anywhere? - 2/24/2004 5:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/24/2004 6:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/24/2004 6:16:00 PM
Help: Using enumeration that disregards case - 2/24/2004 8:01:00 PM
Quick question regarding XPath - 2/25/2004 1:38:00 PM
semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/25/2004 8:16:00 PM
ANN: Momento - 2/26/2004 3:37:00 AM
OT: Push, CDF and early XML applications - 2/26/2004 9:03:00 AM
parsing xsl file in java - 2/26/2004 10:04:00 AM
parsing xsl file in java - 2/26/2004 10:07:00 AM
A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A Free XUL Spec - 2/26/2004 11:04:00 AM
processor - 2/26/2004 7:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A Free - 2/26/2004 7:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL - 2/26/2004 7:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What's wrong with a XBL, SVG-RCC, XForms combo? - 2/26/2004 7:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL - 2/26/2004 7:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL - 2/26/2004 7:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML test documents - 2/26/2004 11:00:00 PM
any XML-related international conference? - 2/27/2004 5:29:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] help XML - 2/27/2004 8:40:00 AM
XML Schema repositiry - 2/27/2004 2:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 3:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] any XML-related international conference? - 2/27/2004 4:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema repositiry - 2/27/2004 4:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 5:23:00 PM
SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 6:54:00 PM
From me - 2/27/2004 9:59:00 PM
Call for Participation: DataX'04 @ EDBT 2004 - 2/28/2004 12:26:00 AM
EditiX 1.1 - XML Editor - 2/28/2004 1:14:00 PM
Web Service Security Toolkit - 2/29/2004 3:51:00 AM
Standard Java Toolkit for WS Security and SAML APIs - 2/29/2004 4:36:00 AM
[xml-dev] Web Services security protocols - 2/29/2004 2:04:00 PM
XML Schema and XML 1.1 - 2/29/2004 9:06:00 PM
XUpdate Working Draft - 2/29/2004 11:17:00 PM
[xml-dev] - unsubscribe - 2/29/2004 11:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema and XML 1.1 - 2/29/2004 11:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Universal names vs context - was Re: [xml-dev] Schema fragments for everyday stuff - 2/1/2004 1:11:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Schema fragments for everyday stuff - 2/1/2004 1:18:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/1/2004 10:43:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/1/2004 3:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Universal names vs context - was Re: [xml-dev] Schema fragments for everyday stuff - 2/1/2004 6:29:00 PM
Canonicalization software - 2/1/2004 7:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/1/2004 9:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Schema fragments for everyday stuff - 2/1/2004 10:51:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 1:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 2:23:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 5:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 11:41:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 12:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 1:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 4:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 12:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 1:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 2:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 3:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 3:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 11:41:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 12:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 1:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 4:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 12:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 1:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 2:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 3:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalization software - 2/2/2004 3:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schema fragments for everyday stuff - 2/2/2004 9:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Schema fragments for everyday stuff - 2/2/2004 8:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Schema fragments for everyday stuff - 2/8/2004 11:52:00 AM
BML == XAML [was Re: UK bank says browserless online banking coming] - 2/2/2004 12:39:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Schema fragments for everyday stuff - 2/8/2004 11:52:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] BML == XAML [was Re: UK bank says browserless onlinebanking coming] - 2/2/2004 12:57:00 PM
XOM 1.0d23 Last Call - 2/2/2004 4:00:00 PM
O'Reilly Open Source Convention Call for Participation - 2/2/2004 4:06:00 PM
WARNING: Namespace thread virus (new variant?) - 2/2/2004 6:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 6:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 8:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WARNING: Namespace thread virus (new variant?) - 2/2/2004 8:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WARNING: Namespace thread virus (new variant?) - 2/2/2004 8:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 8:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 8:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 2:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 8:35:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 2:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 9:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 9:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schema fragments for everyday stuff - 2/2/2004 9:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 10:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 10:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 10:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 10:04:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 10:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 10:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 10:08:00 PM
RE: WARNING: Namespace thread virus (new variant?) - 2/2/2004 10:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/2/2004 10:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: WARNING: Namespace thread virus (new variant?) - 2/3/2004 1:00:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 7:19:00 AM
XML parsing the only way? - 2/3/2004 10:28:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML parsing the only way? - 2/3/2004 10:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML parsing the only way? - 2/3/2004 11:12:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 1:55:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] XML parsing the only way? - 2/3/2004 11:12:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 4:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 4:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 5:01:00 PM
Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: [xml-dev] best practice forproviding newsfeeds ?) - 2/3/2004 5:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 5:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ?) - 2/3/2004 5:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: [xml-dev] bestpractice for providing newsfeeds ?) - 2/3/2004 6:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ?) - 2/3/2004 6:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 5:06:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 5:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ?) - 2/3/2004 5:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: [xml-dev] bestpractice for providing newsfeeds ?) - 2/3/2004 6:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ?) - 2/3/2004 6:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 6:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 6:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 6:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 7:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 8:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 6:41:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 8:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 8:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/4/2004 12:28:00 AM
Updates (was Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds?) - 2/3/2004 8:49:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/4/2004 12:28:00 AM
generating newsfeeds - 2/3/2004 6:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] generating newsfeeds - 2/3/2004 7:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] generating newsfeeds - 2/3/2004 7:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] generating newsfeeds - 2/3/2004 7:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] generating newsfeeds - 2/3/2004 7:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 7:30:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] generating newsfeeds - 2/3/2004 7:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] generating newsfeeds - 2/3/2004 7:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] generating newsfeeds - 2/3/2004 7:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 8:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 8:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 9:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 10:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 9:43:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 9:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 10:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 9:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 10:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 10:29:00 PM
How to connect web services - 2/3/2004 10:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ? - 2/3/2004 11:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Updates (was Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ?) - 2/3/2004 11:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Updates (was Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ?) - 2/4/2004 1:08:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Updates (was Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ?) - 2/6/2004 11:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Expertise and Innovation - was Re: [xml-dev] Non-Borgservers can authenticate Borg clients (Was Re: [xml-dev] Re: Cookies atXML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation) - 2/4/2004 1:58:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Updates (was Re: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ?) - 2/6/2004 11:02:00 PM
Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 3:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 3:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 3:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 3:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 4:09:00 PM
Intepretation of choice compositor and occurence into xml schema - 2/4/2004 3:07:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 3:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 3:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 4:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Intepretation of choice compositor and occurence into xml schema - 2/5/2004 2:59:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 3:23:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 4:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 5:10:00 PM
Problems with schema creation, help!! - 2/4/2004 3:50:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 5:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Problems with schema creation, help!! - 2/4/2004 4:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Problems with schema creation, help!! - 2/4/2004 4:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Problems with schema creation, help!! - 2/4/2004 4:15:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Problems with schema creation, help!! - 2/4/2004 4:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Problems with schema creation, help!! - 2/4/2004 4:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Problems with schema creation, help!! - 2/4/2004 5:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Problems with schema creation, help!! - 2/4/2004 5:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 5:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/4/2004 6:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/6/2004 8:28:00 PM
XML 1.1 and friends are now W3C Recommendations - 2/4/2004 6:09:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/6/2004 8:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML 1.1 and friends are now W3C Recommendations - 2/4/2004 6:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML 1.1 and friends are now W3C Recommendations - 2/4/2004 7:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML 1.1 and friends are now W3C Recommendations - 2/4/2004 7:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Expertise and Innovation - was Re: [xml-dev]Non-Borg servers can authenticate Borg clients (Was Re: [xml-dev] Re:Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation) - 2/4/2004 7:33:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] XML 1.1 and friends are now W3C Recommendations - 2/4/2004 7:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML 1.1 and friends are now W3C Recommendations - 2/4/2004 7:49:00 PM
reply-to - 2/4/2004 7:35:00 PM
Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 7:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 8:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoSAttacks? - 2/4/2004 8:54:00 PM
Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 9:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 11:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Expertise and Innovation - was Re: [xml-dev] Non-Borgservers can authenticate Borg clients (Was Re: [xml-dev] Re: Cookies atXML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation) - 2/4/2004 8:07:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoSAttacks? - 2/4/2004 8:54:00 PM
Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 9:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 11:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 8:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 8:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 8:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 8:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 8:46:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 8:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 8:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 9:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 9:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 9:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 10:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 11:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/7/2004 12:14:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 8:58:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 9:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 9:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 10:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 11:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/7/2004 12:14:00 AM
Choose your RSS - 2/4/2004 9:03:00 PM
more silly questions - 2/4/2004 9:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] reply-to - 2/4/2004 9:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 9:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 11:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 11:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 6:06:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 10:20:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 9:27:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 11:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 6:06:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 10:20:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Choose your RSS - 2/4/2004 9:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 9:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/4/2004 9:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 10:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Att acks? - 2/4/2004 10:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Choose your RSS - 2/4/2004 10:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Choose your RSS - 2/5/2004 12:15:00 AM
[ANN] XMLOpen Conference Reschedules - 2/5/2004 12:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 2:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 2:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 4:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 3:06:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 4:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 3:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 3:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 4:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] reply-to - 2/5/2004 4:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 4:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 5:53:00 PM
Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/5/2004 7:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/5/2004 7:13:00 PM
Re: Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/5/2004 7:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/5/2004 8:42:00 PM
Re: Re: Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/5/2004 9:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/5/2004 10:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/6/2004 6:26:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/5/2004 7:14:00 PMRe: Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/5/2004 7:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/5/2004 8:42:00 PM
Re: Re: Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/5/2004 9:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/5/2004 10:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/6/2004 6:26:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 7:27:00 PM
Attribute values: double quote vs. single quote - 2/5/2004 8:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Is there an XML Schema for XSLT 1.0? - 2/5/2004 8:56:00 PM
SOAP library written in C - 2/5/2004 9:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/5/2004 9:52:00 PM
hello - 2/5/2004 10:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 7:37:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 9:04:00 AM
Splitting the Atom - 2/6/2004 9:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Splitting the Atom - 2/6/2004 1:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Splitting the Atom - 2/6/2004 1:29:00 PM
Layered XML Services Application [was: Splitting the Atom] - 2/11/2004 1:37:00 PM
[ANN] eXist 1.0 beta1 featuring XQuery - 2/6/2004 11:32:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Splitting the Atom - 2/6/2004 1:29:00 PM
Layered XML Services Application [was: Splitting the Atom] - 2/11/2004 1:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 2:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] didn't i read somewhere how xml was going to facilitate document interchange - 2/6/2004 2:17:00 PM
XML Schema - redefine - 2/6/2004 3:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 3:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 5:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 8:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoSAttacks? - 2/6/2004 10:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 10:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 10:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 5:19:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 8:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoSAttacks? - 2/6/2004 10:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 10:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 10:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 9:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 10:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/6/2004 11:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoSAttacks? - 2/7/2004 1:06:00 AM
Web services conference at the Supercomputer Center (slides, audio, video) - 2/7/2004 12:16:00 AMRE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoSAttacks? - 2/7/2004 1:06:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions - 2/7/2004 2:23:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/7/2004 2:44:00 AM
Problem associating an XML document with an XML schema - 2/7/2004 4:34:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/7/2004 5:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/7/2004 6:09:00 PM
Hello - 2/8/2004 11:31:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks? - 2/8/2004 5:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] more silly questions - 2/8/2004 6:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] more silly questions - 2/8/2004 7:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] more silly questions - 2/8/2004 8:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] more silly questions - 2/8/2004 7:47:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] more silly questions - 2/8/2004 8:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] more silly questions - 2/8/2004 8:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] more silly questions - 2/9/2004 12:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] more silly questions - 2/9/2004 1:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema - redefine - 2/8/2004 10:48:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] more silly questions - 2/9/2004 12:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] more silly questions - 2/9/2004 1:10:00 AM
A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 12:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 2:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 5:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 1:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 1:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 3:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 7:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 9:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/26/2004 2:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/26/2004 3:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 2:57:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 5:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 1:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 1:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 3:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 7:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 9:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/26/2004 2:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/26/2004 3:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 3:57:00 PM
[xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 4:16:00 PM
Alternative to MSXML - 2/9/2004 9:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 9:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 10:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 10:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/10/2004 12:36:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/10/2004 5:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/11/2004 5:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/11/2004 6:03:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 10:41:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/9/2004 10:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/10/2004 12:36:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/10/2004 5:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/11/2004 5:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/11/2004 6:03:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] more silly questions - 2/9/2004 11:14:00 PM
Existing libraries/mechanisms for alphabetically sorting and formatting XML files - 2/10/2004 1:40:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Existing libraries/mechanisms for alphabetically sortingand formatting XML files - 2/10/2004 3:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Existing libraries/mechanisms for alphabetically sorting and formatting XML files - 2/10/2004 1:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Existing libraries/mechanisms for alphabetically sorting and formatting XML files - 2/11/2004 2:28:00 AM
[ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2004-02-11 - 2/11/2004 2:16:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Existing libraries/mechanisms for alphabetically sorting and formatting XML files - 2/10/2004 1:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Existing libraries/mechanisms for alphabetically sorting and formatting XML files - 2/11/2004 2:28:00 AM
Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/11/2004 10:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/11/2004 10:44:00 AM
and - predefined values for XML elements - 2/11/2004 12:09:00 PM
Job Scheduler Schemas? - 2/11/2004 2:31:00 PM
hello - 2/11/2004 3:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/11/2004 6:04:00 PM
xsd to xml - 2/11/2004 9:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xsd to xml - 2/11/2004 9:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xsd to xml - 2/11/2004 9:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xsd to xml - 2/11/2004 10:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xsd to xml - 2/12/2004 1:31:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] xsd to xml - 2/11/2004 9:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xsd to xml - 2/11/2004 10:10:00 PM
NullPointerException - 2/12/2004 2:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] NullPointerException - 2/12/2004 2:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] NullPointerException - 2/12/2004 2:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] NullPointerException - 2/12/2004 2:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] NullPointerException - 2/12/2004 3:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] NullPointerException - 2/12/2004 3:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] NullPointerException - 2/12/2004 3:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] NullPointerException - 2/12/2004 7:52:00 PM
XML inside another XML - 2/12/2004 5:10:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] NullPointerException - 2/12/2004 2:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] NullPointerException - 2/12/2004 2:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] NullPointerException - 2/12/2004 3:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] NullPointerException - 2/12/2004 3:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] NullPointerException - 2/12/2004 3:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] NullPointerException - 2/12/2004 7:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML inside another XML - 2/12/2004 7:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML inside another XML - 2/12/2004 8:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML inside another XML - 2/13/2004 12:05:00 PM
TEST: ignore - 2/12/2004 6:44:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] XML inside another XML - 2/12/2004 8:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML inside another XML - 2/13/2004 12:05:00 PM
database primary keys in XML Schema - 2/12/2004 7:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] database primary keys in XML Schema - 2/12/2004 7:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] database primary keys in XML Schema - 2/12/2004 8:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] database primary keys in XML Schema - 2/12/2004 9:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] database primary keys in XML Schema - 2/13/2004 12:07:00 PM
XMLSpy and - 2/12/2004 7:22:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] database primary keys in XML Schema - 2/12/2004 8:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] database primary keys in XML Schema - 2/12/2004 9:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] database primary keys in XML Schema - 2/13/2004 12:07:00 PM
US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/12/2004 11:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/12/2004 11:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/13/2004 12:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/13/2004 2:24:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/13/2004 12:15:00 PM
W3C Web Services Architecture - 2/12/2004 11:38:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/13/2004 12:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/13/2004 2:24:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/13/2004 12:15:00 PM
Is the USPTO run by knaves or fools? - was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/13/2004 1:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is the USPTO run by knaves or fools? - was Re: [xml-dev]US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/13/2004 1:25:00 PM
Patent Spam (was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897) - 2/13/2004 1:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patent Spam (was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897) - 2/13/2004 3:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/13/2004 9:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patent Spam (was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897) - 2/20/2004 11:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is the USPTO run by knaves or fools? - was Re: [xml-dev]US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/13/2004 1:25:00 PM
Patent Spam (was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897) - 2/13/2004 1:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patent Spam (was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897) - 2/13/2004 3:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/13/2004 9:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/14/2004 12:52:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/14/2004 1:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/14/2004 6:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/14/2004 9:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is the USPTO run by knaves or fools? - was Re: [xml-dev]US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/16/2004 2:01:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/14/2004 1:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/14/2004 6:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/14/2004 9:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patent Spam (was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897) - 2/20/2004 11:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Web Services Architecture - 2/13/2004 1:28:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Web Services Architecture - 2/13/2004 2:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/13/2004 8:38:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] W3C Web Services Architecture - 2/13/2004 2:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XMLSpy and - 2/13/2004 10:55:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] database primary keys in XML Schema - 2/13/2004 1:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] database primary keys in XML Schema - 2/13/2004 1:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] database primary keys in XML Schema - 2/13/2004 1:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Is the USPTO run by knaves or fools? - was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/13/2004 2:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XMLSpy and - 2/13/2004 2:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patent Spam (was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897) - 2/13/2004 2:51:00 PM
XslBricks: Rapid XSL Stylesheet Development Library - 2/13/2004 3:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XMLSpy and - 2/13/2004 3:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patent Spam (was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897) - 2/13/2004 3:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patent Spam (was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897) - 2/13/2004 3:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patent Spam (was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897) - 2/13/2004 9:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patent Spam (was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897) - 2/13/2004 3:44:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Patent Spam (was Re: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897) - 2/13/2004 9:56:00 PM
XInclude - 2/13/2004 5:01:00 PM
Sax filter encoding problem - 2/13/2004 5:14:00 PM
Visualization: A Picture Is Worth A Beer - 2/13/2004 8:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Visualization: A Picture Is Worth A Beer - 2/13/2004 8:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Visualization: A Picture Is Worth A Beer - 2/13/2004 8:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Visualization: A Picture Is Worth A Beer - 2/13/2004 9:10:00 PM
generating XSLT from instances - 2/13/2004 10:13:00 PM
Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS - 2/13/2004 11:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS - 2/13/2004 11:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS - 2/14/2004 2:50:00 AM
Announce: Free updates of new electronic XSL book editions to existing customers - XML Dev - 2/14/2004 3:07:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS - 2/14/2004 2:50:00 AM
Re: RE: [xml-dev] XML inside another XML - 2/14/2004 5:03:00 AM
Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz about XML - 2/14/2004 9:24:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz aboutXML - 2/14/2004 9:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz aboutXML - 2/16/2004 2:10:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz about XML - 2/14/2004 10:57:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz aboutXML - 2/16/2004 2:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz about XML - 2/14/2004 3:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz aboutXML - 2/14/2004 6:56:00 PM
Benefits of SOAP? - was Re: [xml-dev] Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz about XML - 2/14/2004 9:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz about XML - 2/16/2004 12:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/15/2004 12:55:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz aboutXML - 2/14/2004 6:56:00 PM
Benefits of SOAP? - was Re: [xml-dev] Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz about XML - 2/14/2004 9:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz about XML - 2/16/2004 12:06:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML inside another XML - 2/15/2004 4:10:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz about XML - 2/15/2004 8:35:00 PM
"Your XML guide" - 2/16/2004 12:34:00 AM
id proxy - 2/16/2004 10:47:00 AM
RE: id proxy - 2/16/2004 2:25:00 PM
I wonder how much involved M$ really were when the final XML technicalrecommendation was finally released... - 2/16/2004 4:38:00 PM
JAXB Schema problems with complexTypes - 2/16/2004 5:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: id proxy - 2/16/2004 8:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] document XML inside another document XML using XLINK - 2/16/2004 10:21:00 PM
Double declaring same element - 2/17/2004 1:27:00 PM
doesn't work - 2/17/2004 1:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XMLSpy and - 2/17/2004 1:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] US Patent 6,687,897 - 2/17/2004 3:26:00 PM
ID bjobiyo... thanks - 2/17/2004 3:32:00 PM
Posted genx alpha tarball and docs - 2/17/2004 11:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Posted genx alpha tarball and docs - 2/18/2004 11:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Posted genx alpha tarball and docs - 2/23/2004 1:21:00 PM
SVG Open 2004 in Japan - Call for Participation - 2/18/2004 6:18:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Posted genx alpha tarball and docs - 2/23/2004 1:21:00 PM
[ANN] new XML reader and writer - 2/18/2004 7:05:00 AM
ID rlsyuynaun... thanks - 2/18/2004 8:25:00 AM
Announcement: Release of Scala v1.1.0-b1 - 2/18/2004 9:13:00 AM
how to best integrate XML in a programming language - 2/18/2004 9:59:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] how to best integrate XML in a programming language - 2/18/2004 11:24:00 AM
[xml-dev] virus in the list - 2/18/2004 4:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] how to best integrate XML in a programming language - 2/19/2004 1:12:00 PM
JSR 206 and SAX - 2/18/2004 9:38:00 PM[xml-dev] virus in the list - 2/18/2004 4:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] how to best integrate XML in a programming language - 2/19/2004 1:12:00 PM
JSR 206 and SAX - 2/18/2004 10:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/18/2004 11:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/18/2004 11:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/19/2004 2:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/19/2004 12:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/19/2004 7:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/19/2004 8:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/19/2004 10:39:00 PM
SAX and XML Version (was Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX) - 2/19/2004 10:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/19/2004 11:42:00 PM
XML 3E and SAX (Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX) - 2/20/2004 12:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/20/2004 5:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/20/2004 5:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX and XML Version - 2/20/2004 5:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/20/2004 5:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/20/2004 8:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX and XML Version - 2/20/2004 9:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/20/2004 9:30:00 PM
schema constraints - 2/18/2004 10:57:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/18/2004 11:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/19/2004 2:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/19/2004 12:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/19/2004 7:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/19/2004 8:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/19/2004 10:39:00 PM
SAX and XML Version (was Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX) - 2/19/2004 10:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/19/2004 11:42:00 PM
XML 3E and SAX (Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX) - 2/20/2004 12:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/20/2004 5:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/20/2004 5:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX and XML Version - 2/20/2004 5:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/20/2004 5:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/20/2004 8:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX and XML Version - 2/20/2004 9:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JSR 206 and SAX - 2/20/2004 9:30:00 PM
XML publishing frameworks and software methodologies - 2/19/2004 12:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML publishing frameworks and software methodologies - 2/19/2004 12:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML publishing frameworks and software methodologies - 2/20/2004 12:04:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML publishing frameworks and software methodologies - 2/20/2004 6:52:00 AM
ANN: XML Europe 2004 Programme now available, register today forearly bird rates - 2/19/2004 3:17:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] XML publishing frameworks and software methodologies - 2/20/2004 12:04:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML publishing frameworks and software methodologies - 2/20/2004 6:52:00 AM
XML Help - 2/19/2004 3:42:00 PM
JAXB alternatives - 2/19/2004 4:38:00 PM
Validate XMLagainst schema - 2/19/2004 4:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Help - 2/20/2004 12:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] how to best integrate XML in a programming language - 2/20/2004 7:13:00 AM
RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/20/2004 9:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/20/2004 9:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/20/2004 5:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/20/2004 6:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/22/2004 6:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML publishing frameworks and software methodologies - 2/20/2004 2:06:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/20/2004 5:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/20/2004 6:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/22/2004 6:03:00 PM
When Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam - 2/20/2004 2:13:00 PM
Local Vs Global Vocabularies ( Was RE: [xml-dev] When Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam) - 2/20/2004 2:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Local Vs Global Vocabularies ( Was RE: [xml-dev] When Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam) - 2/20/2004 3:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Local Vs Global Vocabularies ( Was RE: [xml-dev]When Spam Filter s Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam) - 2/22/2004 12:38:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML publishing frameworks and software methodologies - 2/20/2004 3:09:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Local Vs Global Vocabularies ( Was RE: [xml-dev]When Spam Filter s Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam) - 2/22/2004 12:38:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Local Vs Global Vocabularies - 2/20/2004 3:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Local Vs Global Vocabularies - 2/20/2004 4:04:00 PM
schema validate key uniqueness attribute (name) of elements - 2/20/2004 4:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Local Vs Global Vocabularies - 2/20/2004 4:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] schema validate key uniqueness attribute (name) ofelements - 2/20/2004 5:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/20/2004 5:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] schema validate key uniqueness attribute (name)ofelements - 2/20/2004 5:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/20/2004 7:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/20/2004 9:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/22/2004 6:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a 'copyright' version - 2/22/2004 8:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a 'copyright' version - 2/22/2004 9:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a 'copyright' version - 2/22/2004 10:32:00 PM
Announcement: Last Call for W3C XQuery/Xpath2 formal semantics specification - 2/20/2004 8:09:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/22/2004 6:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a 'copyright' version - 2/22/2004 8:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a 'copyright' version - 2/22/2004 9:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a 'copyright' version - 2/22/2004 10:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version - 2/20/2004 9:25:00 PM
Markup For Note taking - 2/21/2004 10:13:00 PM
SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization - 2/22/2004 2:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization - 2/22/2004 3:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization - 2/22/2004 4:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization - 2/22/2004 9:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization - 2/23/2004 6:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization - 2/23/2004 6:43:00 PM
SAX Topic 2004-0004: xmlns Namespace - 2/22/2004 2:17:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization - 2/22/2004 4:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization - 2/22/2004 9:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization - 2/23/2004 6:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization - 2/23/2004 6:43:00 PM
SAX2 Topic Summary - 2/22/2004 2:18:00 PM
SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support - 2/22/2004 2:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support - 2/22/2004 3:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support - 2/22/2004 3:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support - 2/22/2004 6:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support - 2/22/2004 8:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support - 2/22/2004 9:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support - 2/23/2004 6:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support - 2/23/2004 7:08:00 PM
SAX Topic 2004-0001: beta status - 2/22/2004 2:22:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support - 2/22/2004 3:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support - 2/22/2004 6:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support - 2/22/2004 8:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support - 2/22/2004 9:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support - 2/23/2004 6:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support - 2/23/2004 7:08:00 PM
Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/22/2004 3:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/22/2004 3:49:00 PM
Pull Parsing, was Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and othersin the wild? - 2/22/2004 4:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/22/2004 6:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/22/2004 8:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/22/2004 9:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/22/2004 10:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/22/2004 11:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/22/2004 11:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 2:38:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Local Vs Global Vocabularies - 2/22/2004 8:18:00 PMPull Parsing, was Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and othersin the wild? - 2/22/2004 4:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/22/2004 6:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/22/2004 8:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/22/2004 9:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/22/2004 10:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/22/2004 11:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/22/2004 11:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 2:38:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 1:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 4:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 5:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 5:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 6:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 6:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 8:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 9:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 1:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 2:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 8:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 1:10:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 9:11:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 3:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 7:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/25/2004 4:29:00 AM
Where things stand with SAX - 2/25/2004 9:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Where things stand with SAX - 2/26/2004 12:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/27/2004 4:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/27/2004 4:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 2:05:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 12:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 5:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 5:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 6:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 6:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 8:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 9:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 1:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 2:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/23/2004 8:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 1:10:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 9:11:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 3:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 7:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/25/2004 4:29:00 AM
Where things stand with SAX - 2/25/2004 9:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Where things stand with SAX - 2/26/2004 12:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/27/2004 4:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/27/2004 4:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 2:05:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild? - 2/24/2004 12:48:00 PM
Announce: Free Online XForms Validation Service - 2/23/2004 3:10:00 AM
Announce: XForms Institute Hosts O'Reilly XForms Essentials - 2/23/2004 3:10:00 AM
xlink svg namespace bug? - 2/23/2004 11:35:00 AM
websites - 2/23/2004 12:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] websites - 2/23/2004 2:37:00 PM
help XML - 2/23/2004 4:33:00 PM
Standards for Search Systems - 2/23/2004 5:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Standards for Search Systems - 2/23/2004 6:04:00 PM
equivalence of and et. al. ? - 2/23/2004 8:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] equivalence of and et. al. ? - 2/23/2004 8:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] websites - 2/23/2004 10:59:00 PM
writing good xml - 2/24/2004 12:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] writing good xml - 2/24/2004 12:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] writing good xml - 2/24/2004 1:49:00 PM
[A bit more] Re: [xml-dev] writing good xml - 2/24/2004 1:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] writing good xml - 2/24/2004 2:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [A bit more] Re: [xml-dev] writing good xml - 2/24/2004 2:36:00 PM
Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/24/2004 1:58:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] writing good xml - 2/24/2004 1:49:00 PM
[A bit more] Re: [xml-dev] writing good xml - 2/24/2004 1:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] writing good xml - 2/24/2004 2:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [A bit more] Re: [xml-dev] writing good xml - 2/24/2004 2:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/24/2004 2:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/24/2004 2:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/25/2004 1:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/24/2004 2:06:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/24/2004 2:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/25/2004 1:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/24/2004 2:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/24/2004 2:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] help XML - 2/24/2004 5:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/24/2004 5:42:00 PM
Is XML UI Language (XUL) Going Anywhere? - 2/24/2004 5:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/24/2004 6:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Coding Makes You Dumb - 2/24/2004 6:16:00 PM
Help: Using enumeration that disregards case - 2/24/2004 8:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Help: Using enumeration that disregards case - 2/25/2004 8:22:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Help: Using enumeration that disregards case - 2/25/2004 1:47:00 PM
What do want in a FAQ for a new spec - 2/24/2004 8:18:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Help: Using enumeration that disregards case - 2/25/2004 1:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What do want in a FAQ for a new spec - 2/24/2004 11:09:00 PM
parsing xsl file in java - 2/25/2004 10:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] parsing xsl file in java - 2/25/2004 3:43:00 PM
How to send binary data using XML? - 2/25/2004 5:17:00 AMparsing xsl file in java - 2/25/2004 10:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] parsing xsl file in java - 2/25/2004 3:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to send binary data using XML? - 2/25/2004 6:05:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] How to send binary data using XML? - 2/25/2004 2:01:00 PM
writing good xml - 2/25/2004 1:33:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] How to send binary data using XML? - 2/25/2004 2:01:00 PM
Quick question regarding XPath - 2/25/2004 1:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Quick question regarding XPath - 2/25/2004 1:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Quick question regarding XPath - 2/25/2004 1:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Quick question regarding XPath - 2/25/2004 2:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Quick question regarding XPath - 2/25/2004 2:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Quick question regarding XPath - 2/25/2004 2:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Quick question regarding XPath - 2/25/2004 2:36:00 PM
Re: Quick question regarding XPath - 2/26/2004 1:43:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Quick question regarding XPath - 2/26/2004 10:35:00 AM
Question regarding XSLT number function - 2/25/2004 1:57:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Quick question regarding XPath - 2/25/2004 1:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Quick question regarding XPath - 2/25/2004 2:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Quick question regarding XPath - 2/25/2004 2:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Quick question regarding XPath - 2/25/2004 2:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Quick question regarding XPath - 2/25/2004 2:36:00 PM
Re: Quick question regarding XPath - 2/26/2004 1:43:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Quick question regarding XPath - 2/26/2004 10:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Question regarding XSLT number function - 2/25/2004 2:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Question regarding XSLT number function - 2/26/2004 9:33:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] What do want in a FAQ for a new spec - 2/25/2004 4:21:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Question regarding XSLT number function - 2/26/2004 9:33:00 AM
semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/25/2004 8:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/25/2004 8:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/25/2004 9:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/25/2004 9:11:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/26/2004 9:45:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/25/2004 8:29:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/26/2004 11:33:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 1:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 2:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 5:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 2:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 3:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 3:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 5:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 3:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/28/2004 6:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 3:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 1:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 2:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 5:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 2:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 3:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 3:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 5:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 3:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/28/2004 6:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 3:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/25/2004 9:12:00 PM
ANN: Momento - 2/26/2004 3:37:00 AM
OT: Push, CDF and early XML applications - 2/26/2004 9:03:00 AM
parsing xsl file in java - 2/26/2004 10:04:00 AM
parsing xsl file in java - 2/26/2004 10:07:00 AM
A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A Free XUL Spec - 2/26/2004 11:04:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL Spec - 2/26/2004 11:24:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A Free XULSpec - 2/26/2004 11:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL Spec - 2/26/2004 1:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL Spec - 2/26/2004 1:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXULSpec - 2/26/2004 1:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXULSpec - 2/26/2004 2:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation - 2/26/2004 3:39:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A Free XULSpec - 2/26/2004 11:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL Spec - 2/26/2004 1:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL Spec - 2/26/2004 1:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXULSpec - 2/26/2004 1:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXULSpec - 2/26/2004 2:29:00 PM
processor - 2/26/2004 7:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A Free - 2/26/2004 7:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL - 2/26/2004 7:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What's wrong with a XBL, SVG-RCC, XForms combo? - 2/26/2004 7:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL - 2/26/2004 7:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL - 2/26/2004 7:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML test documents - 2/26/2004 11:00:00 PM
any XML-related international conference? - 2/27/2004 5:29:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] help XML - 2/27/2004 8:40:00 AM
XML Schema repositiry - 2/27/2004 2:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 3:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] any XML-related international conference? - 2/27/2004 4:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema repositiry - 2/27/2004 4:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 4:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 5:23:00 PM
SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 6:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 7:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 8:14:00 PM
Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 8:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 8:42:00 PM
Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 9:42:00 PM
Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 11:13:00 PM
Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 11:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 11:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 12:31:00 AM
Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 12:31:00 AM
Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 4:22:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 4:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 9:46:00 AM
Another SAX 1.1 issue (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX -endDocument() confusion again) - 2/28/2004 12:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 12:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 2:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 3:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 3:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 4:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 5:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 5:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 5:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/29/2004 1:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/29/2004 1:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/29/2004 2:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/29/2004 6:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/29/2004 7:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd) - 2/27/2004 7:10:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 8:14:00 PM
Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 8:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 8:42:00 PM
Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 9:42:00 PM
Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 11:13:00 PM
Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 11:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/27/2004 11:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 12:31:00 AM
Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 12:31:00 AM
Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 4:22:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 4:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 9:46:00 AM
Another SAX 1.1 issue (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX -endDocument() confusion again) - 2/28/2004 12:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 12:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 2:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 3:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 3:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 4:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 5:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 5:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/28/2004 5:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/29/2004 1:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/29/2004 1:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/29/2004 2:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/29/2004 6:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again - 2/29/2004 7:00:00 PM
From me - 2/27/2004 9:59:00 PM
Call for Participation: DataX'04 @ EDBT 2004 - 2/28/2004 12:26:00 AM
EditiX 1.1 - XML Editor - 2/28/2004 1:14:00 PM
Web Service Security Toolkit - 2/29/2004 3:51:00 AM
Standard Java Toolkit for WS Security and SAML APIs - 2/29/2004 4:36:00 AM
[xml-dev] Web Services security protocols - 2/29/2004 2:04:00 PM
XML Schema and XML 1.1 - 2/29/2004 9:06:00 PM
XUpdate Working Draft - 2/29/2004 11:17:00 PM
[xml-dev] - unsubscribe - 2/29/2004 11:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema and XML 1.1 - 2/29/2004 11:34:00 PM