Mailing Lists
xml-dev
[OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 12:28:00 PM
[OT] Enhancing the richness of an information system [was: Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system?] - 6/2/2004 3:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 4:19:00 PM
healthcare.xml.org - 6/2/2004 5:08:00 PM
[Fwd: RE: [xml-dev] Enhancing the richness of an information system [was: Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system?]] - 6/2/2004 5:40:00 PM
RE: [Fwd: RE: [xml-dev] Enhancing the richness of an information system [was: Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system?]] - 6/2/2004 5:59:00 PM
Why is it important to distinguish between an extensible versus evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 6:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Why is it important to distinguish between an extensible versus evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 7:00:00 PM
InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XForms The Next Big Thing? - 6/2/2004 8:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XForms The Next Big Thing? - 6/2/2004 9:07:00 PM
An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 9:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 1:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 1:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XFo rms The Next Big Thing? - 6/3/2004 2:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 2:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 2:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an ev olvable information system? - 6/3/2004 2:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of thedocument-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 2:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 2:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/ data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 3:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [x ml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 5:03:00 PM
Operational Requirements for Extension and Evolution of an Information System - 6/3/2004 5:46:00 PM
Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/3/2004 5:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 7:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 7:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 7:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 7:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 8:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [ xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 8:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 8:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/3/2004 9:23:00 PM
Extreme 2004 Program Now Available - 6/3/2004 10:58:00 PM
xul developers list - 6/3/2004 11:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev]InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/4/2004 12:15:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 2:53:00 AM
Test, please ignore - 6/4/2004 3:45:00 AM
OT: John Cowan announces the "Unix Power Classic" - 6/4/2004 4:10:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/4/2004 8:53:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/4/2004 1:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 1:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/4/2004 1:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 3:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 4:25:00 PM
new to xml, looking for comments on our xml/xsl tutorialproject - 6/4/2004 5:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 7:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/4/2004 9:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 1:07:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 2:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 2:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 5:23:00 PM
syntactical clarity of datamodels, rdf? - 6/5/2004 5:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 10:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 5:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 10:10:00 PM
What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 12:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 2:56:00 PM
Conformance Testing and Schemas (WAS RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Sema ntic Web permathread, iteration n+1) - 6/7/2004 3:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 5:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 7:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 8:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/8/2004 3:50:00 AM
Difference between RPC and Doc. type in WSDL(need help) - 6/8/2004 4:22:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Conformance Testing and Schemas (WAS RE: [xml-dev] The triples da tamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Sema ntic Web permathread, iteration n+1 ) - 6/8/2004 1:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/8/2004 1:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 2:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 2:30:00 PM
[ANN] Exchanger XML Editor 2.0 Released - 6/8/2004 2:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 3:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 4:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/8/2004 6:24:00 PM
Fun With Mathematics - 6/8/2004 7:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 8:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/8/2004 9:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/8/2004 10:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/8/2004 10:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/9/2004 8:14:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 8:52:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/9/2004 9:56:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/9/2004 1:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/9/2004 1:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 2:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/9/2004 2:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/9/2004 2:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 3:36:00 PM
Schema constructs - 6/9/2004 3:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 3:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 3:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 4:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/9/2004 4:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 4:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 4:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 4:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schema constructs - 6/9/2004 4:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 6:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 6:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/9/2004 7:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 7:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 11:01:00 PM
Fwd: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/10/2004 12:56:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Schema constructs - 6/10/2004 9:21:00 AM
[ANNOUNCE] Sedna v0.2 released - 6/10/2004 4:01:00 PM
Testing XPath without XSLT? - 6/10/2004 5:06:00 PM
[ANN] Oxygen XML Editor 4.1adds the first XSLT Debugger on Eclipse - 6/10/2004 6:09:00 PM
Validating against Schema from string, not URI - 6/10/2004 7:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Testing XPath without XSLT? - 6/10/2004 8:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/10/2004 8:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/11/2004 1:57:00 PM
Fertile SemWebApps - 6/11/2004 2:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/11/2004 3:55:00 PM
Announce: Public XSLT/XSL-FO training in Phoenix in August [XML-Dev] - 6/11/2004 4:58:00 PM
[ANN] Saxon 8.0 - Schema-Aware XSLT and XQuery processing - 6/11/2004 5:07:00 PM
Another approach to semantic alignment - 6/11/2004 6:46:00 PM
XSLT subtree pruning/ filtering using namespace - 6/12/2004 10:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 10:52:00 AM
Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 1:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 2:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 2:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 3:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing) - 6/12/2004 3:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 3:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 3:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing) - 6/12/2004 4:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 4:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 4:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing) - 6/12/2004 5:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 5:08:00 PM
Leading the web...elsewhere? - 6/12/2004 5:09:00 PM
How I learned to stop worrying and love the semantic web - was Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/12/2004 6:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 7:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev]Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 7:32:00 PM
XML schema: how to define choice between value as an attribute and value as element text - 6/12/2004 8:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/13/2004 5:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How I learned to stop worrying and love the semantic web - was Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/13/2004 3:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 5:43:00 AM
Prospero and other URLs with // in path - 6/14/2004 11:36:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 1:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 3:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 6:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 7:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 7:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 7:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 8:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 9:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/14/2004 9:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing) - 6/14/2004 9:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/15/2004 10:29:00 AM
HELP psychotic namespaces! - 6/15/2004 11:42:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 3:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 5:53:00 PM
RE: Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 6:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/16/2004 2:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/16/2004 3:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/16/2004 5:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/16/2004 5:17:00 PM
SAX dot NET - Unifying Extension interfaces - 6/16/2004 6:20:00 PM
ANN: XBIS 0.9.5 and articles (binary XML permathread) - 6/16/2004 7:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] progressive parsing of XML. Any technology out there? - 6/16/2004 8:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] New Infoworld article on XML and relational databases - 6/16/2004 10:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/16/2004 11:44:00 PM
Microsoft Proves Pronouns Patentable - 6/17/2004 12:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] New Infoworld article on XML and relational databases - 6/17/2004 12:48:00 AM
ebXML examples - 6/17/2004 1:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ebXML examples - 6/17/2004 4:48:00 PM
Extreme Late-breaking Call for Participation - 6/17/2004 9:10:00 PM
Inheritance in XML - 6/17/2004 10:12:00 PM
XML schema problem for two definitions of the same element. - 6/18/2004 7:27:00 AM
DTDDoc - 6/18/2004 10:24:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Inheritance in XML - 6/18/2004 3:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing) - 6/18/2004 4:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/19/2004 7:50:00 PM
XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity - 6/21/2004 1:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity - 6/21/2004 6:07:00 PM
question about restrictions - 6/21/2004 10:17:00 PM
[Ann] freebXML Registry version 3.0-alpha2 release - 6/22/2004 8:32:00 PM
ANN: Syntext Dtd2Xs v2.0: XML DTD to XML Schema Converter - 6/23/2004 2:07:00 PM
How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/23/2004 2:51:00 PM
Unsubscribing - 6/23/2004 5:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/23/2004 6:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/23/2004 7:59:00 PM
What is the difference between the XMLinfoset and Canonical xml? - 6/23/2004 9:45:00 PM
governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned - 6/24/2004 8:57:00 AM
XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/24/2004 1:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/24/2004 2:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/24/2004 3:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/24/2004 4:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/25/2004 1:30:00 PM
ANNOUNCEMENT: vtd-xml just released under GPL - 6/28/2004 2:57:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/28/2004 2:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 2:55:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 3:16:00 PM
XML 2004: call for artwork - 6/28/2004 4:34:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/28/2004 4:38:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 5:22:00 PM
fast-infoset and fast-webservices (ASN.1 and XML) - 6/28/2004 5:49:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 7:22:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 7:33:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 8:16:00 PM
ANN: Fantastic XML editor for OS X - Alpha Test 1 - 6/28/2004 11:32:00 PM
[ANN] XML Standards Library 2.1 : Updated 2004-06-29 - 6/29/2004 3:52:00 AM
hi all - 6/29/2004 11:16:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/29/2004 1:57:00 PM
Standards and Colonies - 6/29/2004 2:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 5:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 6:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 6:55:00 PM
ANN: New XML Differencing, Updated XML Mapping in Stylus Studio 5.3 - 6/29/2004 8:13:00 PM
Choosing the correct XML API - 6/29/2004 9:58:00 PM
ANN: Excelsior! Path Preview 0.1 - 6/30/2004 3:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 7:57:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 4:18:00 PM
ANN: Oracle XDK 10.1.0.2.0 for AIX, HP-UX64 and LINUX production release - 6/30/2004 6:46:00 PM
Re: [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable informationsystem? - 6/2/2004 1:15:00 PM
Re: [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 4:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 1:18:00 PMRe: [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 4:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 2:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 10:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 2:53:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 10:03:00 PM
[OT] Enhancing the richness of an information system [was: Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system?] - 6/2/2004 3:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 4:19:00 PM
healthcare.xml.org - 6/2/2004 5:08:00 PM
[Fwd: RE: [xml-dev] Enhancing the richness of an information system [was: Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system?]] - 6/2/2004 5:40:00 PM
RE: [Fwd: RE: [xml-dev] Enhancing the richness of an information system [was: Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system?]] - 6/2/2004 5:59:00 PM
Why is it important to distinguish between an extensible versus evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 6:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Why is it important to distinguish between an extensible versus evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 7:00:00 PM
InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XForms The Next Big Thing? - 6/2/2004 8:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XForms The Next Big Thing? - 6/2/2004 9:07:00 PM
Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:28:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XFo rms The Next Big Thing? - 6/3/2004 1:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:[xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:[xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev]InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 6:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:[xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 6:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/9/2004 9:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 4:43:00 AMRE: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XFo rms The Next Big Thing? - 6/3/2004 1:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:[xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:[xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev]InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 6:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:[xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 6:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/9/2004 9:30:00 PM
An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 9:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 11:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 2:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of thedocument-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 11:55:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 2:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 1:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 1:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 1:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [x ml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 3:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 1:57:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [x ml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 3:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XFo rms The Next Big Thing? - 6/3/2004 2:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 2:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 2:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an ev olvable information system? - 6/3/2004 2:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of thedocument-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 2:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 2:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/ data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 3:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [x ml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 5:03:00 PM
Operational Requirements for Extension and Evolution of an Information System - 6/3/2004 5:46:00 PM
Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/3/2004 5:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/4/2004 8:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/4/2004 8:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 5:59:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/4/2004 8:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:[xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 6:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/7/2004 10:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 6:48:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/7/2004 10:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 7:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 7:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 7:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 7:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 8:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [ xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 8:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 8:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 1:11:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 2:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev]InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 1:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 9:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 9:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 8:34:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 2:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 5:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev]InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/4/2004 5:05:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 1:02:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 10:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 11:06:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 2:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 10:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 10:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/10/2004 10:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 11:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 11:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 11:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 1:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 10:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/10/2004 8:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/11/2004 5:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 1:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 3:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 2:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 3:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/11/2004 10:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/13/2004 9:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 5:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 6:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/11/2004 5:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/13/2004 9:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 7:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 7:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 10:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 8:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 8:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 9:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 11:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 11:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 11:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 12:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 2:59:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 4:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 4:26:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 10:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 5:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 5:11:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 5:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 5:29:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 7:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 8:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 9:14:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 9:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 12:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 12:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 6:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 6:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 10:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/11/2004 11:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/13/2004 9:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/8/2004 6:10:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 10:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 11:06:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 2:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 10:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 10:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/10/2004 10:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 11:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 11:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 11:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 1:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 10:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/10/2004 8:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/11/2004 5:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 1:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 3:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 2:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 3:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/11/2004 10:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/13/2004 9:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 5:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 6:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/11/2004 5:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/13/2004 9:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 7:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 7:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 10:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 8:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 8:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 9:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 11:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 11:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 11:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 12:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 2:59:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 4:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 4:26:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 10:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 5:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 5:11:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 5:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 5:29:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 7:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 8:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 9:14:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 9:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 12:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 12:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 6:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 6:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 10:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/11/2004 11:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/13/2004 9:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev]InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 1:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 9:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 9:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/3/2004 9:23:00 PM
Extreme 2004 Program Now Available - 6/3/2004 10:58:00 PM
xul developers list - 6/3/2004 11:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev]InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/4/2004 12:15:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 2:53:00 AM
Test, please ignore - 6/4/2004 3:45:00 AM
OT: John Cowan announces the "Unix Power Classic" - 6/4/2004 4:10:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/4/2004 8:53:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/4/2004 10:03:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/8/2004 2:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/8/2004 4:13:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Webpermathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 9:48:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/8/2004 2:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/8/2004 4:13:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/4/2004 1:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 1:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/4/2004 1:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 3:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 4:25:00 PM
new to xml, looking for comments on our xml/xsl tutorialproject - 6/4/2004 5:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 7:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/4/2004 9:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 1:07:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev]InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 1:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:[xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 10:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:[xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 3:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 1:16:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:[xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 10:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:[xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 3:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 2:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 2:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 5:23:00 PM
syntactical clarity of datamodels, rdf? - 6/5/2004 5:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] syntactical clarity of datamodels, rdf? - 6/5/2004 5:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] syntactical clarity of datamodels, rdf? - 6/5/2004 7:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] syntactical clarity of datamodels, rdf? - 6/6/2004 1:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 5:39:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] syntactical clarity of datamodels, rdf? - 6/5/2004 7:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] syntactical clarity of datamodels, rdf? - 6/6/2004 1:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 10:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 4:55:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 5:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/6/2004 1:49:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 5:19:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 5:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 10:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 10:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 8:33:00 PM
To know about RPC Vs document - 6/7/2004 12:14:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 8:33:00 PM
What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 12:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 1:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 2:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 12:48:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 2:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 2:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 3:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 4:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 7:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 3:51:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 4:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 7:17:00 PM
Conformance Testing and Schemas (WAS RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Sema ntic Web permathread, iteration n+1) - 6/7/2004 3:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 5:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 7:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 8:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/8/2004 3:50:00 AM
Difference between RPC and Doc. type in WSDL(need help) - 6/8/2004 4:22:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Difference between RPC and Doc. type in WSDL(need help) - 6/8/2004 9:21:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Difference between RPC and Doc. type in WSDL(need help) - 6/8/2004 1:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Difference between RPC and Doc. type in WSDL(need help) - 6/8/2004 1:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWebpermathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 9:56:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Difference between RPC and Doc. type in WSDL(need help) - 6/8/2004 1:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Difference between RPC and Doc. type in WSDL(need help) - 6/8/2004 1:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Conformance Testing and Schemas (WAS RE: [xml-dev] The triples da tamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Sema ntic Web permathread, iteration n+1 ) - 6/8/2004 1:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/8/2004 1:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 2:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 2:30:00 PM
[ANN] Exchanger XML Editor 2.0 Released - 6/8/2004 2:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 3:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 4:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/8/2004 6:24:00 PM
Fun With Mathematics - 6/8/2004 7:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 8:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/8/2004 9:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/8/2004 10:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/8/2004 10:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/8/2004 11:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/10/2004 12:28:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 11:01:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/10/2004 12:28:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 11:16:00 PM
disable-output-escaping - 6/9/2004 1:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/9/2004 2:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 12:48:00 AMdisable-output-escaping - 6/9/2004 1:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/9/2004 2:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 1:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 1:57:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 2:20:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 1:57:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 12:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 6:20:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing) - 6/9/2004 12:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 12:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing) - 6/9/2004 1:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 12:57:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 12:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing) - 6/9/2004 1:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/9/2004 8:14:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 8:52:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/9/2004 9:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/9/2004 11:21:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/9/2004 2:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 12:21:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/9/2004 2:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/9/2004 1:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/9/2004 1:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 2:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/9/2004 2:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/9/2004 2:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 3:36:00 PM
Schema constructs - 6/9/2004 3:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 3:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 3:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 4:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/9/2004 4:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 4:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 4:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 4:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schema constructs - 6/9/2004 4:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Schema constructs - 6/9/2004 5:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Schema constructs - 6/10/2004 7:48:00 AM
cdata - 6/9/2004 4:54:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Schema constructs - 6/10/2004 7:48:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 6:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 6:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 6:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] cdata - 6/9/2004 6:29:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 6:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 6:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/9/2004 7:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 7:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 11:01:00 PM
Fwd: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/10/2004 12:56:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Schema constructs - 6/10/2004 9:21:00 AM
[ANNOUNCE] Sedna v0.2 released - 6/10/2004 4:01:00 PM
Testing XPath without XSLT? - 6/10/2004 5:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Testing XPath without XSLT? - 6/10/2004 5:19:00 PM
Re: Testing XPath without XSLT? - 6/11/2004 12:19:00 AM
ANN: XSL-on-the-fly WYSIWYG XML Editor Syntext Serna 2.0 Beta - 6/10/2004 5:49:00 PMRe: Testing XPath without XSLT? - 6/11/2004 12:19:00 AM
[ANN] Oxygen XML Editor 4.1adds the first XSLT Debugger on Eclipse - 6/10/2004 6:09:00 PM
Validating against Schema from string, not URI - 6/10/2004 7:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Testing XPath without XSLT? - 6/10/2004 8:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/10/2004 8:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/11/2004 11:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/11/2004 4:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 1:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 2:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 2:46:00 PM
RDF == the "binary relational model"? was Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/14/2004 4:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDF == the "binary relational model"? - 6/14/2004 5:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDF == the "binary relational model"? was Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/14/2004 9:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/10/2004 9:03:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/11/2004 4:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 1:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 2:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 2:46:00 PM
RDF == the "binary relational model"? was Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/14/2004 4:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDF == the "binary relational model"? - 6/14/2004 5:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDF == the "binary relational model"? was Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/14/2004 9:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/11/2004 1:57:00 PM
Fertile SemWebApps - 6/11/2004 2:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/11/2004 3:55:00 PM
Announce: Public XSLT/XSL-FO training in Phoenix in August [XML-Dev] - 6/11/2004 4:58:00 PM
[ANN] Saxon 8.0 - Schema-Aware XSLT and XQuery processing - 6/11/2004 5:07:00 PM
Another approach to semantic alignment - 6/11/2004 6:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Another approach to semantic alignment - 6/11/2004 7:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Another approach to semantic alignment - 6/12/2004 3:11:00 PM
EFF seeking ten patents to challenge (deadline 23 June) - 6/11/2004 7:51:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Another approach to semantic alignment - 6/12/2004 3:11:00 PM
XSLT subtree pruning/ filtering using namespace - 6/12/2004 10:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 10:52:00 AM
Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 1:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous,was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 3:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 2:00:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 3:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous,was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 4:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 4:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 8:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 8:28:00 PM
Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 1:07:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 4:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 8:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 8:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 2:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 2:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 3:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing) - 6/12/2004 3:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 3:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 3:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing) - 6/12/2004 4:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 4:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 4:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing) - 6/12/2004 5:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 5:08:00 PM
Leading the web...elsewhere? - 6/12/2004 5:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Leading the web...elsewhere? - 6/12/2004 6:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Leading the web...elsewhere? - 6/12/2004 6:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Leading the web...elsewhere? - 6/12/2004 6:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing) - 6/12/2004 5:19:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Leading the web...elsewhere? - 6/12/2004 6:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Leading the web...elsewhere? - 6/12/2004 6:36:00 PM
How I learned to stop worrying and love the semantic web - was Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/12/2004 6:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 7:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev]Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 7:32:00 PM
XML schema: how to define choice between value as an attribute and value as element text - 6/12/2004 8:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML schema: how to define choice between value as an attribute and value as element text - 6/12/2004 10:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML schema: how to define choice between value as an attribute and value as element text - 6/14/2004 5:20:00 AM
RE: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/13/2004 4:40:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] XML schema: how to define choice between value as an attribute and value as element text - 6/14/2004 5:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/13/2004 5:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How I learned to stop worrying and love the semantic web - was Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/13/2004 3:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 5:43:00 AM
Prospero and other URLs with // in path - 6/14/2004 11:36:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 1:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 3:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 4:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 5:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 6:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/14/2004 5:03:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 5:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 6:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 6:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 7:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 7:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 7:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 8:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 9:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/14/2004 9:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing) - 6/14/2004 9:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing) - 6/17/2004 9:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing) - 6/18/2004 4:44:00 PM
specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/18/2004 5:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 9:58:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing) - 6/18/2004 4:44:00 PM
specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/18/2004 5:35:00 PM
RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/18/2004 8:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/18/2004 5:52:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/18/2004 9:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/19/2004 7:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/20/2004 11:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/19/2004 7:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/20/2004 11:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/15/2004 10:29:00 AM
HELP psychotic namespaces! - 6/15/2004 11:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] HELP psychotic namespaces! - 6/15/2004 12:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] HELP psychotic namespaces! - 6/15/2004 1:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] HELP psychotic namespaces! - 6/15/2004 2:05:00 PM
Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 2:08:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] HELP psychotic namespaces! - 6/15/2004 1:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] HELP psychotic namespaces! - 6/15/2004 2:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 2:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 3:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 4:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 4:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 6:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 7:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/15/2004 2:41:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 3:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 4:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 4:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 6:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 7:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/15/2004 3:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 3:22:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 3:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 5:53:00 PM
RE: Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 6:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/16/2004 2:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/16/2004 3:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/16/2004 5:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/16/2004 5:17:00 PM
SAX dot NET - Unifying Extension interfaces - 6/16/2004 6:20:00 PM
ANN: XBIS 0.9.5 and articles (binary XML permathread) - 6/16/2004 7:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] progressive parsing of XML. Any technology out there? - 6/16/2004 8:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] progressive parsing of XML. Any technology out ther e? - 6/17/2004 1:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] progressive parsing of XML. Any technology out ther e? - 6/17/2004 4:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ANN: XBIS 0.9.5 and articles (binary XML permathread) - 6/16/2004 9:21:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] progressive parsing of XML. Any technology out ther e? - 6/17/2004 4:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] New Infoworld article on XML and relational databases - 6/16/2004 10:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/16/2004 11:44:00 PM
Microsoft Proves Pronouns Patentable - 6/17/2004 12:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] New Infoworld article on XML and relational databases - 6/17/2004 12:48:00 AM
ebXML examples - 6/17/2004 1:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ebXML examples - 6/17/2004 4:48:00 PM
Extreme Late-breaking Call for Participation - 6/17/2004 9:10:00 PM
Inheritance in XML - 6/17/2004 10:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Inheritance in XML - 6/18/2004 2:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Inheritance in XML - 6/21/2004 12:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Inheritance in XML - 6/21/2004 12:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Inheritance in XML - 6/21/2004 12:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Inheritance in XML - 6/21/2004 1:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ebXML examples - 6/18/2004 5:03:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Inheritance in XML - 6/21/2004 12:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Inheritance in XML - 6/21/2004 12:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Inheritance in XML - 6/21/2004 12:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Inheritance in XML - 6/21/2004 1:13:00 PM
XML schema problem for two definitions of the same element. - 6/18/2004 7:27:00 AM
DTDDoc - 6/18/2004 10:24:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Inheritance in XML - 6/18/2004 3:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing) - 6/18/2004 4:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/19/2004 7:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/20/2004 8:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] ebXML examples - 6/21/2004 12:27:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/21/2004 12:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/21/2004 5:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/21/2004 7:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/22/2004 9:36:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/22/2004 10:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/23/2004 9:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/23/2004 4:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/28/2004 10:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/28/2004 10:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 6:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 8:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 12:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 6:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 7:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/21/2004 5:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/21/2004 7:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/22/2004 9:36:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/22/2004 10:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/23/2004 9:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/23/2004 4:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/28/2004 10:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/28/2004 10:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 6:25:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 8:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 11:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 7:27:00 AM
loose coupling, was Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery forJava (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 7:44:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 9:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 8:18:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 11:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 7:27:00 AM
loose coupling, was Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery forJava (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 7:44:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 9:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 8:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 12:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 6:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 7:19:00 AM
XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity - 6/21/2004 1:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity - 6/21/2004 1:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity - 6/22/2004 8:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity - 6/21/2004 1:56:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity - 6/22/2004 8:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity - 6/21/2004 5:26:00 PM
OFFTOPIC: Go SpaceShipOne - 6/21/2004 3:27:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity - 6/21/2004 8:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms,endless complexity - 6/21/2004 11:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity - 6/22/2004 2:07:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms,endless complexity - 6/21/2004 11:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity - 6/22/2004 2:07:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity - 6/21/2004 6:07:00 PM
question about restrictions - 6/21/2004 10:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] question about restrictions - 6/22/2004 2:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] question about restrictions - 6/22/2004 11:21:00 AM
Re: question about restrictions - 6/22/2004 12:50:00 PM
how to make the order of elements in the DTD null n void - 6/22/2004 11:16:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] question about restrictions - 6/22/2004 11:21:00 AM
Re: question about restrictions - 6/22/2004 12:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] how to make the order of elements in the DTD null n void - 6/22/2004 11:44:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] how to make the order of elements in the DTD null n void - 6/22/2004 12:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] how to make the order of elements in the DTD null nvoid - 6/22/2004 12:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] how to make the order of elements in the DTD null n void - 6/22/2004 1:36:00 PM
[ANN] xframe - xsddoc-0.5-beta released - 6/22/2004 2:33:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] how to make the order of elements in the DTD null n void - 6/22/2004 12:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] how to make the order of elements in the DTD null nvoid - 6/22/2004 12:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] how to make the order of elements in the DTD null n void - 6/22/2004 1:36:00 PM
[Ann] freebXML Registry version 3.0-alpha2 release - 6/22/2004 8:32:00 PM
ANN: Syntext Dtd2Xs v2.0: XML DTD to XML Schema Converter - 6/23/2004 2:07:00 PM
How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/23/2004 2:51:00 PM
Unsubscribing - 6/23/2004 5:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/23/2004 6:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets onthe Internet) - 6/23/2004 7:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/24/2004 3:54:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/23/2004 7:53:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/24/2004 3:54:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/23/2004 7:59:00 PM
What is the difference between the XMLinfoset and Canonical xml? - 6/23/2004 9:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What is the difference between the XMLinfoset and Canonical xml? - 6/23/2004 11:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What is the difference between the XMLinfoset and Canonical xml? - 6/23/2004 11:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What is the difference between the XMLinfoset and Canonical xml? - 6/24/2004 4:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/23/2004 10:24:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] What is the difference between the XMLinfoset and Canonical xml? - 6/23/2004 11:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What is the difference between the XMLinfoset and Canonical xml? - 6/24/2004 4:30:00 PM
governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned - 6/24/2004 8:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned - 6/24/2004 10:55:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] governmental recommendation(non-US) thatrpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned - 6/24/2004 12:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned - 6/24/2004 3:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] governmental recommendation(non-US) thatrpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned - 6/24/2004 11:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/24/2004 1:44:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] governmental recommendation(non-US) thatrpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned - 6/24/2004 12:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned - 6/24/2004 3:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] governmental recommendation(non-US) thatrpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned - 6/24/2004 11:13:00 PM
XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/24/2004 1:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/24/2004 11:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/24/2004 11:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/25/2004 6:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification orComplexification? - 6/29/2004 1:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/24/2004 2:09:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/24/2004 11:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/25/2004 6:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification orComplexification? - 6/29/2004 1:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/24/2004 2:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/24/2004 3:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/24/2004 4:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/25/2004 1:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/25/2004 6:13:00 PM
xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/25/2004 6:20:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/25/2004 9:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/29/2004 10:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/26/2004 12:19:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/29/2004 10:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/25/2004 6:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/25/2004 7:10:00 PM
this is a test, please ignore - 6/28/2004 2:43:00 AMRE: [xml-dev] xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/25/2004 7:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/25/2004 7:07:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/25/2004 7:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/26/2004 7:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/26/2004 9:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/26/2004 10:06:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/27/2004 2:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/26/2004 7:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/26/2004 9:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/26/2004 10:06:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/27/2004 2:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/25/2004 7:10:00 PM
ANNOUNCEMENT: vtd-xml just released under GPL - 6/28/2004 2:57:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/28/2004 2:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 2:55:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 3:16:00 PM
XML 2004: call for artwork - 6/28/2004 4:34:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/28/2004 4:38:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 5:22:00 PM
fast-infoset and fast-webservices (ASN.1 and XML) - 6/28/2004 5:49:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 7:22:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 7:33:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 8:16:00 PM
ANN: Fantastic XML editor for OS X - Alpha Test 1 - 6/28/2004 11:32:00 PM
[ANN] XML Standards Library 2.1 : Updated 2004-06-29 - 6/29/2004 3:52:00 AM
hi all - 6/29/2004 11:16:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/29/2004 1:57:00 PM
Standards and Colonies - 6/29/2004 2:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 5:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 6:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 6:55:00 PM
ANN: New XML Differencing, Updated XML Mapping in Stylus Studio 5.3 - 6/29/2004 8:13:00 PM
Choosing the correct XML API - 6/29/2004 9:58:00 PM
ANN: Excelsior! Path Preview 0.1 - 6/30/2004 3:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 7:57:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 10:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 3:57:00 PM
problem saving microsoft.xmldom object - 6/30/2004 11:54:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 3:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 4:18:00 PM
ANN: Oracle XDK 10.1.0.2.0 for AIX, HP-UX64 and LINUX production release - 6/30/2004 6:46:00 PM