Mailing Lists

xml-dev



Recommend A Java-XML Forum - 2/1/2005 12:39:00 AM
Constraints for nested elements; key and keyref - 2/1/2005 9:39:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] find with XPath over file system - 2/1/2005 12:32:00 PM
What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 12:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] find with XPath over file system - 2/1/2005 12:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 12:46:00 PM
Re: Re: [xml-dev] Constraints for nested elements; key and keyref - 2/1/2005 1:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 3:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 3:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 4:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 6:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 6:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 7:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 7:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: 3 XML Design Principles [T2005013101A6] - 2/1/2005 8:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3Cmeeting in March - 2/1/2005 8:21:00 PM
CFP: XML, OSCON 2005 - 2/1/2005 9:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] find with XPath over file system [T2005020100AK] - 2/2/2005 12:21:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] find with XPath over file system [T2005020100AK] - 2/2/2005 3:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March - 2/2/2005 2:26:00 PM
Re: XSLT Reuse (Was: Even if you're not ... (Was: If you're going to the W3C meeting in March)) - 2/2/2005 2:37:00 PM
Re: XSLT Reuse (Was: Even if you're not ... (Was: If you're going to the W3C meeting in March)) - 2/2/2005 3:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3Cmeeting in March - 2/2/2005 3:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March - 2/2/2005 3:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March - 2/2/2005 4:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March - 2/2/2005 4:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March - 2/2/2005 4:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] [T2005020100MS] - 2/2/2005 6:04:00 PM
ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.4 - 2/2/2005 11:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March [T2005020200AU] - 2/2/2005 11:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March [T2005020200AU] - 2/2/2005 11:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Recommend A Java-XML Forum [T2005020200BW] - 2/3/2005 12:00:00 AM
xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/3/2005 11:06:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March [T2005020200AU] - 2/3/2005 12:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Recommend A Java-XML Forum [T2005020200F1] - 2/3/2005 2:40:00 PM
The BBC, Mozilla.org, and Microsoft to provide keynote speakers for XTECH 2005 --registration now open - 2/3/2005 4:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] 3 XML Design Principles - 2/3/2005 8:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3Cmeeting in March - 2/3/2005 8:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/3/2005 10:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/3/2005 11:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 12:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 2:06:00 PM
typing with XML Schema - 2/4/2005 2:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] typing with XML Schema - 2/4/2005 2:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 3:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 4:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 4:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 5:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 5:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 5:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 5:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 6:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 8:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 8:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 8:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 10:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 10:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 10:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 10:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 11:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/5/2005 12:03:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/7/2005 6:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/7/2005 7:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/8/2005 6:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/8/2005 6:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/8/2005 7:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/8/2005 7:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/8/2005 8:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/8/2005 10:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/8/2005 11:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? [T2005020400A5] - 2/4/2005 10:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] typing with XML Schema [T2005020400AD] - 2/4/2005 10:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 10:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 11:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/5/2005 1:45:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/5/2005 1:50:00 AM
How simple is simple enough? - was Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/5/2005 3:59:00 AM
OASIS TC Call for Participation: OASIS SOA-RM TC - 2/5/2005 5:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How simple is simple enough? - was Re: [xml-dev] xml2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/5/2005 12:26:00 PM
The Myth of Explicit Relationships [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/5/2005 8:12:00 PM
swamp cleanup day for xml 1.0 ... - 2/6/2005 1:23:00 PM
Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/6/2005 3:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The Myth of Explicit Relationships [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/6/2005 5:31:00 PM
Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/6/2005 5:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How simple is simple enough? - was Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/6/2005 5:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/6/2005 6:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/6/2005 9:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/6/2005 9:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/7/2005 12:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 1:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 4:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 5:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits"myth come from? - 2/7/2005 9:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 10:55:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 11:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 1:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 1:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 1:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 2:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 2:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 2:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 3:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 3:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 3:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 4:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 4:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 5:49:00 PM
RE: spam - 2/7/2005 7:47:00 PM
Unqualified Element without using xs:any - 2/7/2005 8:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 9:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 10:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 10:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 10:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 10:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 11:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Unqualified Element without using xs:any - 2/8/2005 12:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 1:02:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 1:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 2:46:00 AM
Bounce messages from AdventureMail.com - 2/8/2005 3:00:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 3:18:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Bounce messages from AdventureMail.com - 2/8/2005 3:26:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 5:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 5:42:00 AM
This week's XML Puzzler - 2/8/2005 5:54:00 AM
XSLT stylistics query - 2/8/2005 6:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 9:50:00 AM
The XML 300 baud challenge - Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 10:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 12:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 1:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 3:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 3:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 4:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 4:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 5:05:00 PM
Java open source Schema aware XPath 2.0 processor released - 2/8/2005 5:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 5:22:00 PM
[ADMIN] broken archive - 2/8/2005 5:47:00 PM
Before fragmenting, fix the broken bits first - 2/8/2005 5:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 6:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 7:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/10/2005 6:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/10/2005 6:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/10/2005 7:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/13/2005 10:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/14/2005 9:24:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/14/2005 3:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/16/2005 7:03:00 AM
Is the Web Stochastic? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?) - 2/8/2005 9:21:00 PM
Is this constraint expressible in XML Schema? - 2/8/2005 10:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Is this constraint expressible in XML Schema? - 2/9/2005 12:41:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/9/2005 12:17:00 PM
baffling encoding problem - 2/9/2005 12:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 2:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 7:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 8:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/9/2005 9:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 10:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 10:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 10:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/9/2005 10:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 11:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 11:34:00 PM
Combining DTD and Schema declarations in the same XML - 2/9/2005 2:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 7:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/9/2005 8:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 8:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] baffling encoding problem - 2/9/2005 9:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 9:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/9/2005 10:18:00 PM
external entities - 2/10/2005 12:00:00 AM
extrernal entities - part 2 - 2/10/2005 2:25:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Is this constraint expressible in XML Schema? - 2/10/2005 4:19:00 PM
Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems - 2/10/2005 4:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems - 2/10/2005 6:23:00 PM
XML turns 7 - 2/10/2005 7:17:00 PM
XML jargon: declaration vs. definition - 2/10/2005 8:43:00 PM
[xml-dev] XML jargon: declaration vs. definition - 2/10/2005 9:35:00 PM
does expat support xsd? - 2/11/2005 3:24:00 AM
Assigning meaning to an element if attributes are present - 2/11/2005 7:10:00 AM
@href or @src? - 2/11/2005 9:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] @href or @src? - 2/12/2005 12:29:00 AM
use of xslt.rnc or xslt.xsd? - 2/12/2005 5:55:00 PM
[ANN] nux-1.0 final release - 2/12/2005 9:57:00 PM
what is the difference between "xs" and "xsd" for XML schema? - 2/12/2005 10:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] what is the difference between "xs" and "xsd" for XML schema? - 2/13/2005 4:39:00 PM
[ANN] RSSDigest - 2/13/2005 8:08:00 PM
Public Review of OASIS ebXML RIM and RS v3.0 specifications - 2/14/2005 12:41:00 AM
URLs of DTDs question - 2/14/2005 3:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] URLs of DTDs question - 2/14/2005 4:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems - 2/14/2005 8:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems - 2/14/2005 9:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Public Review of OASIS ebXML RIM and RS v3.0 specifications - 2/14/2005 10:14:00 PM
Master Foo explains XML to aliens - 2/15/2005 10:22:00 AM
Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" - 2/15/2005 10:54:00 AM
Dynamically generating Java 'wrapper' class for XML - 2/16/2005 12:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/16/2005 7:03:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/16/2005 8:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/16/2005 9:06:00 AM
choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/16/2005 5:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/16/2005 5:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/16/2005 5:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/16/2005 6:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/16/2005 7:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/18/2005 10:36:00 AM
Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/18/2005 11:32:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/18/2005 10:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/18/2005 11:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 4:06:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 9:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 9:39:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 9:50:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 10:23:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 11:17:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 11:42:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 12:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 2:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/21/2005 9:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/21/2005 1:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 11:34:00 PM
Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/18/2005 11:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/19/2005 5:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/19/2005 5:52:00 PM
Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 7:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 9:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 10:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 10:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 10:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 10:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 10:27:00 PM
The Stealth Specs: XQuery / XSLT publish 10 Working Drafts - 2/16/2005 10:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 10:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 10:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 11:02:00 PM
sequence with elements with the same name is not allowed? - 2/16/2005 11:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" - 2/16/2005 11:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" - 2/17/2005 9:09:00 AM
What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3"Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/17/2005 11:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/18/2005 8:48:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] sequence with elements with the same name is not allowed? - 2/16/2005 11:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/17/2005 1:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/17/2005 3:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/17/2005 8:12:00 PM
New Technologies will change the business of publishing -- learn how -- March 9 in New York - 2/17/2005 11:14:00 PM
[ANN] XML Standards Library 2.1 : Updated 2005-02-17 - 2/18/2005 1:42:00 AM
Substitution Groups - 2/18/2005 10:01:00 AM
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/18/2005 9:19:00 PM
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/18/2005 10:08:00 PM
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/18/2005 10:58:00 PM
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/18/2005 10:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/18/2005 10:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 7:39:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 11:12:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 11:24:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 4:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 4:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 4:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 5:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 7:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/21/2005 9:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/21/2005 4:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/21/2005 4:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/21/2005 4:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/22/2005 10:06:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/22/2005 9:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/22/2005 9:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/23/2005 1:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/23/2005 4:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/23/2005 8:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/23/2005 8:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/23/2005 9:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/23/2005 9:15:00 PM
[ANN] XML BeLux XML Schema Series - 2/20/2005 2:14:00 PM
DTD element type "ANY" vs. XML Schema element type "anyType" - 2/20/2005 4:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTD element type "ANY" vs. XML Schema element type "anyType" - 2/20/2005 5:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DTD element type "ANY" vs. XML Schema element type "anyType" - 2/20/2005 6:02:00 PM
A Business Analysts View: 3 XML Design Principles - 2/20/2005 7:10:00 PM
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/21/2005 10:12:00 PM
Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke Kawaguchi) - 2/22/2005 6:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (byKohsuke Kawaguchi) - 2/23/2005 10:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by KohsukeKawaguchi) - 2/23/2005 12:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (byKohsuke - 2/23/2005 12:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke - 2/23/2005 12:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (byKohsuke - 2/23/2005 1:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke Kawaguchi) - 2/23/2005 2:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by - 2/23/2005 2:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke - 2/23/2005 6:51:00 PM
schema keyref to other schema. - 2/22/2005 10:46:00 AM
dynamic elements - 2/22/2005 1:34:00 PM
Jobs - 2/22/2005 3:25:00 PM
X3D Midi Sensor Node - 2/22/2005 6:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] X3D Midi Sensor Node - 2/22/2005 7:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/23/2005 9:40:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/23/2005 9:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/23/2005 10:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/23/2005 3:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/23/2005 4:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/23/2005 6:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/23/2005 7:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/24/2005 5:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/24/2005 2:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/24/2005 3:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/24/2005 4:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/24/2005 4:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/24/2005 5:42:00 PM
XML nd images - 2/23/2005 10:37:00 AM
[XUS] An XML URN Scheme - 2/23/2005 3:59:00 PM
Open source XML Schema Editor (graphical) in Java - 2/23/2005 5:49:00 PM
question about xercesc - 2/24/2005 7:11:00 PM
You are made active - 2/24/2005 9:12:00 PM
XML Binary Characterization publishes three new drafts - 2/25/2005 11:21:00 AM
[XUS] URN applied to Document Management Systems - 2/25/2005 1:03:00 PM
RSS/RSS-Data for General Data Exchange - 2/25/2005 5:04:00 PM
[ANN] XTech 2005 schedule posted - 2/26/2005 1:14:00 PM
[ANN] xframe - xsddoc 0.7-beta released - 2/26/2005 5:57:00 PM
=?US-ASCII?B?W0FOTl0gTWFya3VwV2FyZSAtIFNpbGtQYWdlIENvcmUgMC4zLjAgcmVsZWFzZWQ=?= - 2/27/2005 10:27:00 AM
=?US-ASCII?B?UmU6ICBbZG9jYm9vay1hcHBzXSBbQU5OXSBNYXJrdXBXYXJlIC0gU2lsa1BhZ2UgQ29yZSAwLjMuMCByZWxlYXNlZA==?= - 2/27/2005 1:16:00 PM
=?US-ASCII?B?UmU6IFt4bWwtZGV2XSBbQU5OXSBNYXJrdXBXYXJlIC0gU2lsa1BhZ2UgQ29yZSAwLjMuMCByZWxlYXNlZA==?= - 2/27/2005 7:15:00 PM
Quiz: XML flexibility - 2/27/2005 8:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility - 2/27/2005 8:32:00 PM
Document order calculation - 2/27/2005 8:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility - 2/27/2005 10:06:00 PM
WSDL too hard? - 2/28/2005 4:03:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility - 2/28/2005 10:24:00 AM