Mailing Lists
xml-dev
[xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException - 1/2/2009 1:54:00 PM
[xml-dev] Announce: XML Prague 2009 Last Call for Papers - 1/6/2009 1:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed - 1/6/2009 1:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerException (newbie) - 1/6/2009 1:25:00 PM
[xml-dev] [Announce] XQilla 2.2.0 released - 1/6/2009 3:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed - 1/6/2009 3:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embedvalidation information (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents - 1/6/2009 4:37:00 PM
Re: Metalink XML Download Description Format (draft-bryan-metalink-01) - 1/7/2009 2:27:00 AM
XML Technologies You Need For XML Workflow-Based Applications - 1/7/2009 2:22:00 PM
Validating Compound Documents using NVDL - 1/8/2009 8:03:00 PM
XML Schema Incompatibilities with Data Binding Tools - 1/9/2009 7:52:00 PM
What makes a data component good for standardizing? - 1/10/2009 2:34:00 PM
Announce: XML Prague 2009 CFP extended until Jan 16 - 1/12/2009 10:41:00 PM
XSLT Stylesheet query (newbie) - 1/12/2009 10:53:00 PM
A good XML editor for documents? - 1/14/2009 12:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What makes a data component good for standardizing? - 1/15/2009 12:52:00 PM
Serialization with SAX - 1/15/2009 9:30:00 PM
RESTful, Secure, Non-SSL Authentication - 1/17/2009 5:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Norbert Mikula - 1/17/2009 8:52:00 PM
B2MML schemas and definition of Equipment Classes - 1/19/2009 10:01:00 PM
=?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFt4bWwtZGV2XSBNZWFuaW5nIG9mICJEZXNpZ24gZm9yIHRoZSB1bmFudGljaXBhdGVkIHVzZXIi?= - 1/20/2009 2:35:00 PM
XSLT Stylesheet test for special character - 1/21/2009 2:04:00 AM
[ANN] Axl Library 0.5.6 'Bohemian like you' release is ready! - 1/21/2009 11:22:00 AM
Validate an instance document that has a replaceable datacomponent, specified by a taxonomy - 1/21/2009 5:36:00 PM
Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/22/2009 12:27:00 PM
XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/22/2009 1:01:00 PM
Interesting (and useful) tidbits about the ID datatype - 1/23/2009 4:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node - 1/27/2009 1:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node - 1/28/2009 1:06:00 PM
XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefits ofnamespace modularity - 1/28/2009 1:34:00 PM
Same element, different type - 1/29/2009 7:13:00 PM
xml 1.0 document declaration question. - 1/31/2009 11:10:00 AM
Attention! Your PayPal account was limited! - 1/31/2009 7:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException - 1/2/2009 2:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException - 1/2/2009 2:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException - 1/4/2009 10:58:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException - 1/2/2009 2:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException - 1/4/2009 3:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerException (newbie) - 1/6/2009 3:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException - 1/5/2009 2:38:00 AMRE: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerException (newbie) - 1/6/2009 3:44:00 PM
[xml-dev] Announce: XML Prague 2009 Last Call for Papers - 1/6/2009 1:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed - 1/6/2009 1:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerException (newbie) - 1/6/2009 1:25:00 PM
[xml-dev] [Announce] XQilla 2.2.0 released - 1/6/2009 3:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed - 1/6/2009 3:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed - 1/6/2009 3:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed validationinformation (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents - 1/6/2009 10:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embedvalidation information (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents - 1/6/2009 4:23:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed validationinformation (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents - 1/6/2009 10:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embedvalidation information (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents - 1/6/2009 4:37:00 PM
Re: Metalink XML Download Description Format (draft-bryan-metalink-01) - 1/7/2009 2:27:00 AM
XML Technologies You Need For XML Workflow-Based Applications - 1/7/2009 2:22:00 PM
Validating Compound Documents using NVDL - 1/8/2009 8:03:00 PM
XML Schema Incompatibilities with Data Binding Tools - 1/9/2009 7:52:00 PM
What makes a data component good for standardizing? - 1/10/2009 2:34:00 PM
Announce: XML Prague 2009 CFP extended until Jan 16 - 1/12/2009 10:41:00 PM
XSLT Stylesheet query (newbie) - 1/12/2009 10:53:00 PM
A good XML editor for documents? - 1/14/2009 12:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A good XML editor for documents? - 1/14/2009 1:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A good XML editor for documents? - 1/14/2009 2:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A good XML editor for documents? - 1/14/2009 2:57:00 PM
Widget versioning - the widget, the spec, the platform api - 1/15/2009 10:53:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] A good XML editor for documents? - 1/14/2009 2:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A good XML editor for documents? - 1/14/2009 2:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What makes a data component good for standardizing? - 1/15/2009 12:52:00 PM
Serialization with SAX - 1/15/2009 9:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Serialization with SAX - 1/15/2009 10:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Serialization with SAX - 1/15/2009 11:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Serialization with SAX - 1/15/2009 11:49:00 PM
Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/17/2009 1:42:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Serialization with SAX - 1/15/2009 11:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Serialization with SAX - 1/15/2009 11:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/17/2009 3:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/17/2009 4:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/17/2009 4:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/17/2009 5:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/17/2009 10:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/19/2009 2:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/19/2009 9:20:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/19/2009 6:41:00 PM
Norbert Mikula - 1/17/2009 5:29:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/17/2009 4:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/17/2009 4:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/17/2009 5:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/17/2009 10:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/19/2009 2:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/19/2009 9:20:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" - 1/19/2009 6:41:00 PM
RESTful, Secure, Non-SSL Authentication - 1/17/2009 5:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Norbert Mikula - 1/17/2009 8:52:00 PM
B2MML schemas and definition of Equipment Classes - 1/19/2009 10:01:00 PM
=?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFt4bWwtZGV2XSBNZWFuaW5nIG9mICJEZXNpZ24gZm9yIHRoZSB1bmFudGljaXBhdGVkIHVzZXIi?= - 1/20/2009 2:35:00 PM
XSLT Stylesheet test for special character - 1/21/2009 2:04:00 AM
[ANN] Axl Library 0.5.6 'Bohemian like you' release is ready! - 1/21/2009 11:22:00 AM
Validate an instance document that has a replaceable datacomponent, specified by a taxonomy - 1/21/2009 5:36:00 PM
Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/22/2009 12:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/22/2009 12:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/22/2009 1:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/22/2009 6:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/22/2009 8:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/22/2009 8:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet test for special character - 1/22/2009 12:57:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/22/2009 1:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/22/2009 6:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/22/2009 8:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/22/2009 8:54:00 PM
XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/22/2009 1:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/22/2009 1:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/22/2009 1:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/22/2009 2:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/23/2009 8:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/23/2009 9:02:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/23/2009 10:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/23/2009 8:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/26/2009 1:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/23/2009 4:04:00 AMRE: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/22/2009 1:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/22/2009 2:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/23/2009 8:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/23/2009 9:02:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/23/2009 10:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/23/2009 8:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/26/2009 1:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/23/2009 8:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/23/2009 9:29:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/23/2009 9:50:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/23/2009 10:08:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/23/2009 10:16:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/23/2009 11:13:00 AM
[ANN] XMLmind XSL-FO Converter 4.3 released - 1/23/2009 9:35:00 AMRe: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/23/2009 9:29:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/23/2009 9:50:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/23/2009 10:08:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/23/2009 10:16:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? - 1/23/2009 11:13:00 AM
Interesting (and useful) tidbits about the ID datatype - 1/23/2009 4:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Interesting (and useful) tidbits about the ID datatype - 1/23/2009 4:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Interesting (and useful) tidbits about the ID datatype - 1/25/2009 10:45:00 PM
XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) - 1/26/2009 1:31:00 PMRe: [xml-dev] Interesting (and useful) tidbits about the ID datatype - 1/25/2009 10:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) - 1/26/2009 1:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) - 1/26/2009 1:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) - 1/27/2009 1:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) - 1/27/2009 1:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) - 1/28/2009 1:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? - 1/26/2009 1:36:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) - 1/26/2009 1:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) - 1/27/2009 1:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) - 1/27/2009 1:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) - 1/28/2009 1:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node - 1/27/2009 1:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node - 1/28/2009 1:06:00 PM
XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefits ofnamespace modularity - 1/28/2009 1:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefitsof namespace modularity - 1/28/2009 1:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys thebenefits of namespace modularity - 1/28/2009 2:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefits of namespace modularity - 1/28/2009 2:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefitsof namespace modularity - 1/28/2009 2:30:00 PM
Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/28/2009 4:12:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys thebenefits of namespace modularity - 1/28/2009 2:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefits of namespace modularity - 1/28/2009 2:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefitsof namespace modularity - 1/28/2009 2:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/28/2009 4:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/28/2009 4:31:00 PM
RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/28/2009 5:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/28/2009 6:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/29/2009 12:56:00 AM
RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/29/2009 1:07:00 PM
[Summary] Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/29/2009 2:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/29/2009 4:42:00 PM
RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/30/2009 1:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/30/2009 2:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/30/2009 3:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/30/2009 4:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/30/2009 9:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/31/2009 1:43:00 AM
Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for WorkflowApplications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?] - 1/31/2009 1:17:00 PM
[ANN] XML Prague final program announced - 1/29/2009 2:03:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/28/2009 4:31:00 PM
RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/28/2009 5:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/28/2009 6:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/29/2009 12:56:00 AM
RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/29/2009 1:07:00 PM
[Summary] Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/29/2009 2:16:00 PM
Re: [Summary] Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/29/2009 11:00:00 PM
Re: [Summary] Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/30/2009 12:28:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/29/2009 4:16:00 PMRe: [Summary] Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/30/2009 12:28:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/29/2009 4:42:00 PM
RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/30/2009 1:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/30/2009 2:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/30/2009 3:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/30/2009 4:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/30/2009 9:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? - 1/31/2009 1:43:00 AM
Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for WorkflowApplications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?] - 1/31/2009 1:17:00 PM
Same element, different type - 1/29/2009 7:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Same element, different type - 1/29/2009 7:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Same element, different type - 1/29/2009 11:18:00 PM
Fw: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) - 1/30/2009 12:58:00 PMRE: [xml-dev] Same element, different type - 1/29/2009 11:18:00 PM
xml 1.0 document declaration question. - 1/31/2009 11:10:00 AM
Attention! Your PayPal account was limited! - 1/31/2009 7:34:00 PM